Tough CRs (1000 CR)

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 11:51 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Tough CRs (1000 CR)

by rocky » Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:42 pm
1) A major art theft from a museum was remarkable in that the pieces stolen clearly had been carefully selected. The criterion for selection, however, clearly had not been greatest estimated market value. It follows that the theft was specifically carried out to suit the taste of some individual collector for whose private collection the pieces were destined.
The argument tacitly appeals to which one of the following principles?
(A) Any art theft can, on the evidence of the selection of pieces stolen, be categorized as committed either at the direction of a single known individual or at the direction of a group of known individuals.
(B) Any art theft committed at the direction of a single individual results in a pattern of works taken and works left alone that defies rational analysis.
(C) The pattern of works taken and works left alone can sometimes distinguish one type of art theft from another.
(D) Art thefts committed with no preexisting plan for the disposition of the stolen works do not always involve theft of the most valuable pieces only.
(E) The pattern of works taken and works left alone in an art theft can be particularly damaging to the integrity of the remaining collection.


2)If a society encourages freedom of thought and expression, then, during the time when it does so, creativity will flourish in that society. In the United States creativity flourished during the eighteenth century. It is clear, therefore, that freedom of thought was encouraged in the United States during the eighteenth century.
An error of reasoning of the same kind as one contained in the passage is present in each of the following arguments EXCEPT:
(A) According to the airline industry, airfares have to rise if air travel is to be made safer; since airfares were just raised, we can rest assured that air travel will therefore become safer.
(B) We can conclude that the Hillside police department has improved its efficiency, because crime rates are down in Hillside, and it is an established fact that crime rates go down when police departments increase their efficiency.
(C) People who are really interested in the preservation of wildlife obviously do not go hunting for big game; since Gerda has never gone hunting for big game and intends never to do so, it is clear that she is really interested in the preservation of wildlife.
(D) If the contents of a bottle are safe to drink, the bottle will not be marked “poison,” so, since the bottle is not marked “poison,” its contents will be safe to drink.
(E) None of the so-called Western democracies is really democratic, because, for a country to be democratic, the opinion of each of its citizens must have a meaningful effect on government, and in none of these countries does each citizen’s opinion have such an effect.

3)When 100 people who have not used cocaine are tested for cocaine use, on average only 5 will test positive. By contrast, of every 100 people who have used cocaine 99 will test positive. Thus, when a randomly chosen group of people is tested for cocaine use, the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who have used cocaine.
A reasoning error in the argument is that the argument
(A) attempts to infer a value judgment from purely factual premises
(B) attributes to every member of the population the properties of the average member of the population
(C) fails to take into account what proportion of the population have used cocaine
(D) ignores the fact that some cocaine users do not test positive
(E) advocates testing people for cocaine use when there is no reason to suspect that they have used cocaine
Getting into it
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:43 pm
1. C

2. E.
Question stem uses if X then Y, if Y then X argument, which is flawed.
A, C and D use this form directly. B uses a rearranged form of the above
argument.

3. Split between B and C. More for B than for C.

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 11:51 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by rocky » Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:26 pm
OAs are
C
E
B(Still not understandabe why B is preferred over C)
Can anyone expalin third one??
Getting into it

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:06 pm

by Jhyphi » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:22 am
I also got C, E, C and don't understand why B is the answer in the last one and not C.

While both B and C can be errors, it seems that C is the bigger error.

Legendary Member
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:21 am
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:660(

by 4meonly » Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:57 am
But why for the 3rd question C is not correct?
I think that C also points the logical flaw

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:54 pm

by gmatman1 » Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:02 pm
The answer to question 3 is definitely C.

Consider a population where only very few people use cocaine. For example, let's say only 1 person out of a population of 10.000 people use cocaine. Then there will be far more positive test results among people who have not used cocaine (5:100 = 1:20). So an important factor is the proportion of the population that have used cocaine.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:54 pm

by gmatman1 » Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:06 am
I wonder why so few people have given feedback on this one.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:00 am

by graem83d » Sun May 15, 2016 1:51 am
I would choose C . But i am not sure of my answer