Numbers

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:51 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members

Numbers

by sukhman » Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:09 am
How many times the digits of a computer keyboard will be required to be pressed in typing 1st 100 natural numbers ?
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:31 am
sukhman wrote:How many times the digits of a computer keyboard will be required to be pressed in typing 1st 100 natural numbers ?
In other words, how many digits are in the integers from 1 to 100 inclusive.

1-digit numbers: from 1 to 9 inclusive
There are such 9 integers, and each has 1 digit, for a total of 9 digits

3-digit numbers: 100
There is 1 such integer with 3 digits, for a total of 3 digits

2-digit numbers: from 10 to 99 inclusive
There are 90 such integers, and each has 2 digits, for a total of 180 digits

TOTAL number of digits = 9 + 3 + 180 = 192

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:29 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
sukhman wrote:How many times the digits of a computer keyboard will be required to be pressed in typing 1st 100 natural numbers ?
In other words, how many digits are in the integers from 1 to 100 inclusive.

1-digit numbers: from 1 to 9 inclusive
There are such 9 integers, and each has 1 digit, for a total of 9 digits

3-digit numbers: 100
There is 1 such integer with 3 digits, for a total of 3 digits

2-digit numbers: from 10 to 99 inclusive
There are 90 such integers, and each has 2 digits, for a total of 180 digits

TOTAL number of digits = 9 + 3 + 180 = 192

Cheers,
Brent
Exactly how I would answer it. However there are 2 accepted definitions of "natural number", (reference https://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalNumber.html) the second of which includes zero - which means that an alternative solution would look at the integers 0 to 99, yielding a total of (192 - 1) = 191

I believe we are both correct: 191 or 192, both acceptable.

However, the question states "how many times will be required" and as 192 exceeds necessity, then 191 should be the overall winner! In other words, 191 will be required for either methiod.

PS: This is based on your answer of 192 being correct.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:50 am
Mathsbuddy wrote: Exactly how I would answer it. However there are 2 accepted definitions of "natural number", (reference https://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalNumber.html) the second of which includes zero - which means that an alternative solution would look at the integers 0 to 99, yielding a total of (192 - 1) = 191

I believe we are both correct: 191 or 192, both acceptable.

However, the question states "how many times will be required" and as 192 exceeds necessity, then 191 should be the overall winner! In other words, 191 will be required for either methiod.

PS: This is based on your answer of 192 being correct.
Fortunately, the GMAT test-writers would never require us to know the definition of "natural numbers." In fact, this term does not appear anywhere in the Official Guide.

Instead, they'd say something like ". . . the integers from 1 to 100 inclusive" or perhaps ". . . the first 100 positive integers"

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:39 pm
Hi All,

A few things worth noting with this type of question:

1) IF we were interested in 0 to 99, inclusive, the total number of digits would be 190, NOT 191 (Replacing "100" with "0" removes 2 digits).

2) As Brent has already pointed out, Official GMAT questions are meticulously and very carefully worded, so that there is no ambiguity in what is being asked.

3) If there is any conceivable ambiguity in your mind about the question, then it's worth noting that the writers have likely written the answer choices with 4 easy-to-define "wrong" answers, so that if you have chosen an answer based on an ambiguity, then that answer WON'T BE THERE. This will allow you to re-work the question and catch the "mistake" in your thinking.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:12 am
[email protected] wrote:Hi All,

A few things worth noting with this type of question:

1) IF we were interested in 0 to 99, inclusive, the total number of digits would be 190, NOT 191 (Replacing "100" with "0" removes 2 digits).

2) As Brent has already pointed out, Official GMAT questions are meticulously and very carefully worded, so that there is no ambiguity in what is being asked.

3) If there is any conceivable ambiguity in your mind about the question, then it's worth noting that the writers have likely written the answer choices with 4 easy-to-define "wrong" answers, so that if you have chosen an answer based on an ambiguity, then that answer WON'T BE THERE. This will allow you to re-work the question and catch the "mistake" in your thinking.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Thanks for that. I realised the error afterwards while driving.