BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Object of preposition!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:41 am
One question:

Can object of preposition be antecedent of a Pronoun?

Answer:

1. From Ron:
OBJECTS OF PREPOSITIONS are very rarely the antecedents of pronouns.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/pronoun-ambi ... tml#312862

2. In the Manhattan GMAT sc guide, an example has been given:

Eva exercised daily with Jasmine so that she would stay in good shape.

==> Manhattan Guide says that "she" is ambiguous. I have a question here.

Since Jasmine is the object of preposition "with", SHE refers to Eva.

Am I missing something?

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rishab1988 » Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:12 am
The rule for pronoun antecedent states that

IT MUST BE NOUN.
IT MUST BE ACTUALLY PRESENT IN THE SENTENCE
IT MUST MAKE SENSE
IT MUST AGREE IN NUMBER

other than that there is no rule!


The object of a preposition is ALWAYS a noun,so the object of preposition can be the antecedent.

As said in the explanation by MGMAT,she could refer to either EVA or Jasmine because both are logical antecedents

Please DO NOT FOLLOW ANY RULE UNLESS YOU HAVE VERIFIED IT

1) I usually confirm the rule with an expert or
2) from MGMAT SC strategy guide
3) Online Oxford dictionary. see my explanation of double vs twice.
4) Be cautious unless the rule has been stated with a working example by that person and why the other form is incorrect
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:12 am
Try reading the sentence substituting each of hte names for "she". Either way makes sense, but the meaning changes.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1