new york times

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

new york times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun May 02, 2010 10:48 pm
23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city's election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to

plz answer
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:06 am
Location: India
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:580

by beat_gmat_09 » Sun May 02, 2010 10:52 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city's election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to

plz answer
I will choose E.
failing to should be parallel, second is parallel to first.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:41 pm
Location: Chennai
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:660

by vivek1110 » Mon May 03, 2010 12:29 am
+1 for E

A - Secondarily, sounds awkward

B - Secondly is not parallel with first, also "their" is ambiguous

C - Same as above

D - again "they" is ambiguous

E - is parallel, and concise.
Is caught between a rock and a hard place!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:06 am
Location: India
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:580

by beat_gmat_09 » Mon May 03, 2010 4:12 am
OA?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:09 am

by aspirant2010 » Mon May 03, 2010 9:40 am
I would go for E.......

A,B,C and D contains plural they and board is singular.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:550

by hariharakarthi » Mon May 03, 2010 12:27 pm
+1 E.

Core sentence structure is below,
NY - Editorial criticized City's Election Board for (1) first reason and (2) second reason.

It is a list with conjunction word "and". Hence, both should be parallel.

Underlined section of the sentence tells about the second reason. It should be parallel to first.

Moreover, the other options have pronoun ( their or they ), which does not have an proper logical antecedent.

The possible antecedents available here are
1. NY Times Editorial
2. City's Election board

The possible logical antecedent here is Election Board. The correct pronoun for that will be "it".

Rules of Parallelism and antecedent will determine the correct answer here. That is E.

rgrds,
hhk
Regards,
hhk

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 12:27 pm

by gmat_coolguy » Mon May 03, 2010 12:35 pm
I will go for E too

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Mon May 03, 2010 6:13 pm
OA Is E

Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members

by frank1 » Mon May 03, 2010 7:32 pm
well beside parallelism and all
one reason i jumped straight to E was
board in this case seems singular and use of they and thier doesnt sounds right in IT.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:15 am
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Thanked: 3 times

by neha.patni » Tue May 04, 2010 2:41 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city's election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to

plz answer
IMO E
Second is the correct choice not secondly and Parallel construction

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:02 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:730

by gtvisa2002 » Thu May 06, 2010 7:13 am
Hi,

I agree with others that E might be the best answer.
But my question is,

election board for, first of all, failing to .... second, for failing...

Here if I am not wrong, "For" is not needed after the word "second" because the "for" after the word "board" is applicable for both first and second reasons as it is a parallel construction.

Could anyone please explain, why do we need another "for" .
Thanks.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Thu May 06, 2010 10:01 pm
plz experts comment

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:31 am
What is your question? This is simple sentence. 'election board' is singular and you have 'they/their' plural in a,b,c, and d. So only E is correct.
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:plz experts comment
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

User avatar
Official Company Rep
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:52 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:9 members

by ChrisBKnewton » Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:31 am
gtvisa2002 wrote:Hi,

I agree with others that E might be the best answer.
But my question is,

election board for, first of all, failing to .... second, for failing...

Here if I am not wrong, "For" is not needed after the word "second" because the "for" after the word "board" is applicable for both first and second reasons as it is a parallel construction.

Could anyone please explain, why do we need another "for" .
Thanks.
Hi gtvisa2002,

I think I understand the source of your confusion.

Here, "for" is serving as what's sometimes known as a function word. When a list of two or more items should follow a parallel grammatical structure, function words that introduce these items should also fit this parallel form. Such function words include prepositions and articles.

In a parallel construction, a function word may be placed before only the first item in a list. Ex: Julie has traveled to France, Italy, and Argentina during the past year.

However, function words may also be repeated before each item in the list. Ex. Julie has traveled to France, to Italy, and to Argentina during the past year. This is the case in choice E above.

In general, the important thing to remember is that a function word may not be placed before more than one but fewer than every item in a list. Ex. Julie has traveled to France, Italy, and to Argentina during the past year.

I hope this helps!
Chris Black
Web Content Editor
Knewton

• Page 1 of 1