correlates

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:00 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by honeysn » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:42 pm
Correlates With.

But not sure, experts please advice.
Found below link on same discussion, hope this will be useful.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/correlate-to ... 13887.html

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:06 pm
Hi,
correlates with(correct)
correlates to(incorrect)
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 am
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:660

by chendawg » Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:55 am
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
correlates with(correct)
correlates to(incorrect)
This might not be a split you can eliminate; personally I hear people use both in speech all the time. I'd look for other errors before using this split to rule out answer choices.
I'm not bipolar...I'm bi-winning!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:4 members

by confuse mind » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:03 am
honeysn wrote:Correlates With.

But not sure, experts please advice.
Found below link on same discussion, hope this will be useful.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/correlate-to ... 13887.html
I went through the above mentioned thread and found that Manhattan uses 'correlates with' *only*.
This reminded me of 'compared with and compared to' which are both correct and are contextual.


Experts, can I take from this that 'correlates to' is always wrong.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:06 am
chendawg wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
correlates with(correct)
correlates to(incorrect)
This might not be a split you can eliminate; personally I hear people use both in speech all the time. I'd look for other errors before using this split to rule out answer choices.
Hi,
Agreed. Certainly depends on the context. I will edit that part.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:12 am
confuse mind wrote:
honeysn wrote:Correlates With.

But not sure, experts please advice.
Found below link on same discussion, hope this will be useful.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/correlate-to ... 13887.html
I went through the above mentioned thread and found that Manhattan uses 'correlates with' *only*.
This reminded me of 'compared with and compared to' which are both correct and are contextual.


Experts, can I take from this that 'correlates to' is always wrong.
Hi,
The results of the two practice tests correlate to a high degree.(Correct)
So, I think both are correct. It depends on the context.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

• Page 1 of 1