BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Antarctica, Earth's--verb tenses nightmare

Expert replies

by atulmangal » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:38 pm
@ jaygirl

"had long seemed" is the past tense ...this seemed to be the case but then they found something new so it is no longer the case.
this is past perfect tense not simple past...my doubt was...past perfect should be used in case of two past actions, but in sentence there is only one past action so i suggest that instead of "had long seemed" which is past perfect....we should use "long seemed"...simple past...what u say???

and i understand that the use of present perfect is clearly wrong..no doubt about that...m just doubtful about the use of past perfect that it.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 12:59 pm
atulmangal wrote:my doubt was...past perfect should be used in case of two past actions
@ Atul: Past Perfect is used to describe the following actions:

1. Actions that had been completed before a certain point in time in the past.
Example: John had moved to Seattle before 2006.

2. Actions that had been completed before another action in the past.
Example: John had moved to Seattle before he met Jane.

This sentence fall under 1st action. Hope this helps.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by force5 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:13 pm
@Everyone

the point here is learning... It doesn't matter who is correct and who is not. I expected an expert to answer this question by now and that's why was avoiding any further inputs. discussion is healthy only till a certain limit but after a point expert opinion is necessary to ensure that we are in the right direction.

Experts........
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:16 pm
@Target 2009:
Actions that had been completed before a certain point in time in the past.
Example: John had moved to Seattle before 2006.
Can you justify in specific how the above stmt applies to the question under discussion ?

@Atulmangal : I admire that you dont give up until it is answered. Knewton does not have good Official explanation ? In that case, you might PM som eexpert.

I would have chosen D in exam , but I am curious to know the justification of 'had seemed' ? 'Seem' is a special verb (intransitive and linking), but why Past perfect has to be used here, cant understand.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:49 pm
First of all thanks guys for participation and a healthy discussion

@gmatmadeeasy

I also have the same question which you asked from @target...and knewton has no OE for this question. I agree with you, even i will pick Op D which is OA in exam only because i know the correct IDIOM and Op E is wordy and awkward, but rite now we have this luxury to clear our concept...i will PM some expert for help....

Thanks to all

Atul
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:52 pm
@GMATMadeEasy: Long back some time in past (before 1957) it had seems to be immune.

Actions (it had seems to be immune) that had been completed before a certain point ( before 1957 because since then temp risen 1 degree) in time in the past.

This is how i understand. I don't mind for to be proved wrong :). It will help to clear my concept.

@Force , I agree, discussion is not for who is right or wrong but for sharing our way to justify proposed answers and that can be right or wrong. Now I feel experts must pitch in when we all exhausted otherwise it will be like spoon feeding which may limit our learning.

Anyway all these are my opinion. :)
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by force5 » Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:58 am
True Target2009. Has someone PM'd an expert Yet?
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Thu Apr 07, 2011 8:47 am
Yes, i send the request to an expert. Meanwhile i receive and answer from Knewton also as i mailed them...now my confusion is clear and i understand why past perfect is used.

@force and @gmatmadeeasy

Here is the knewton explanation,

Because the present perfect indicates that an action began in the past and continues into the present or very recent past, it does indicate a past action (just a past action that is ongoing). So if we want to indicate that another past action occurred *before* the action expressed in the present perfect, we should use the past perfect to make the relationship of the tenses clear. Since an action in the present perfect began in the past, just using the simple past for the earlier action would not make the tense relationship clear. And if we used the present perfect for both verbs, then it would seem like they occurred at the same time. So we need the past perfect to make the order of the actions clear.

For example:

I had always planned to go to Spain, but I have been thinking that I might prefer to go to Italy.

Hope this help

Thanks
Join the discussion