BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by antols » Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:55 pm
Is that an OA?

My answer would be E. If, for example, we took y=1 and x = -1 then the question would read:

(-1/2) < 1 - z ?
(-3/2) < -z ?
(3/2) > z ?

Since we don´t have any information about z, then we cannot conclude whether z is less than 3/2...Can someone please explain what´s wrong with my reasoning?
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:34 pm
st(1) implies (x-y) can be either +ve or -ve depends on the value and sign of x. Not Sufficient
st(2) the same cause as in st(1) Not Sufficient

Combining st(1&2): y>0 and x<0 implies (x-y) is negative. On the left hand side we have negative value and on the right hand side we may have any value assigned to z.

1/(x-y) ... y-z
-1/(y-x) ... y-z
y-x>0 and y>x, but we don't know about z

Not Sufficient

The answer to this question cannot be c, are you sure this is OA and what's the source?
HG10 wrote:Is 1/(x - y) < y - z ?

1. y is positive
2. x is negative

Answer: C
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by tomada » Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:03 pm
If we were given a 3rd condition - say, that Z < 0 - we'd have an answer, since the right-hand side of the equation would necessarily be positive and the left-hand side would necessarily be negative. Alas, we do not have that 3rd condition.
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.
Join the discussion

by Troika » Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:02 am
Guys, I'm really sorry about this. The OA is indeed C. However, the question stem is 1/(x - y) < y - x and not 1/(x - y) < y - z. The 'z' was a typo.

Again, I'm really sorry about wasting your time over this typo. I'm generally careful about checking for typos; this one just slipped through. This is quite embarrassing.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:36 am
HG10 wrote:Is 1/(x - y) < y - x ?

1. y is positive
2. x is negative

Answer: C
Statement 1: y is positive
No restrictions on x.
Thus, it is possible x-y=1 or that x-y = -1.

If x-y = 1, then y-x = -1.
Plugging these values into 1/(x-y) < y-x, we get:
1/1 < -1
1 < -1.
NO.

If x-y = -1, then y-x = 1.
Plugging these values into 1/(x-y) < y-x, we get:
1/-1 < 1
-1 < 1.
YES.

Since in the first case the answer is NO, and in the second case the answer is YES, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x is negative
No restrictions on y.
Thus, it is possible that x-y=1 or that x-y = -1.
As we saw above, if x-y=1, then the answer to the question stem is NO, but if x-y=-1, then the answer to the question stem is YES.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1 and 2:

Since x<0 and y>0, x-y<0 and y-x>0.
Plugging these conditions into 1/(x-y) < y-x, we get:
1/negative < positive.
negative < positive.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Troika » Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 pm
@GmatGuruNY:

Thank you for the explanation. I appreciate your help.
Join the discussion