Inequalities question

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:54 am
Thanked: 1 times

by antols » Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:55 pm
Is that an OA?

My answer would be E. If, for example, we took y=1 and x = -1 then the question would read:

(-1/2) < 1 - z ?
(-3/2) < -z ?
(3/2) > z ?

Since we don´t have any information about z, then we cannot conclude whether z is less than 3/2...Can someone please explain what´s wrong with my reasoning?

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:34 pm
st(1) implies (x-y) can be either +ve or -ve depends on the value and sign of x. Not Sufficient
st(2) the same cause as in st(1) Not Sufficient

Combining st(1&2): y>0 and x<0 implies (x-y) is negative. On the left hand side we have negative value and on the right hand side we may have any value assigned to z.

1/(x-y) ... y-z
-1/(y-x) ... y-z
y-x>0 and y>x, but we don't know about z

Not Sufficient

The answer to this question cannot be c, are you sure this is OA and what's the source?
HG10 wrote:Is 1/(x - y) < y - z ?

1. y is positive
2. x is negative

Answer: C
Success doesn't come overnight!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:03 pm
If we were given a 3rd condition - say, that Z < 0 - we'd have an answer, since the right-hand side of the equation would necessarily be positive and the left-hand side would necessarily be negative. Alas, we do not have that 3rd condition.
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:09 pm
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Troika » Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:02 am
Guys, I'm really sorry about this. The OA is indeed C. However, the question stem is 1/(x - y) < y - x and not 1/(x - y) < y - z. The 'z' was a typo.

Again, I'm really sorry about wasting your time over this typo. I'm generally careful about checking for typos; this one just slipped through. This is quite embarrassing.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:36 am
HG10 wrote:Is 1/(x - y) < y - x ?

1. y is positive
2. x is negative

Answer: C
Statement 1: y is positive
No restrictions on x.
Thus, it is possible x-y=1 or that x-y = -1.

If x-y = 1, then y-x = -1.
Plugging these values into 1/(x-y) < y-x, we get:
1/1 < -1
1 < -1.
NO.

If x-y = -1, then y-x = 1.
Plugging these values into 1/(x-y) < y-x, we get:
1/-1 < 1
-1 < 1.
YES.

Since in the first case the answer is NO, and in the second case the answer is YES, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x is negative
No restrictions on y.
Thus, it is possible that x-y=1 or that x-y = -1.
As we saw above, if x-y=1, then the answer to the question stem is NO, but if x-y=-1, then the answer to the question stem is YES.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1 and 2:

Since x<0 and y>0, x-y<0 and y-x>0.
Plugging these conditions into 1/(x-y) < y-x, we get:
1/negative < positive.
negative < positive.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:09 pm
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Troika » Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 pm
@GmatGuruNY:

Thank you for the explanation. I appreciate your help.