wheat production (please help with this one)

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:30 am
Premise:
In 2005, Maltania's WFPI was 60 pounds more than Italy's WFPI.
In 2006, Maltania's WFPI was 75 pounds more than Italy's WFPI.
Conclusion:
Between 2005 and 2006, Maltania's WFPI increased.

Case 1:
In 2005, Italy's WFPI = 100, Maltania's WFPI = 100+60 = 160.
In 2006, Italy's WFPI = 10, Maltania's WFPI = 10+75 = 85.
In this case, Maltania's WFPI decreases from 160 to 85.

To support the conclusion that Maltania's WFPI increased, the correct answer will probably show that Case 1 is not possible.

C: Between 2005 and 2006, Italy's WFPI decreased by 10 pounds per acre.
Here, Case 1 is not possible, since in Case 1 Italy's WFPI decreases by 90 pounds per acre.

Case 2:
In 2005, Italy's WFPI = 100, Maltania's WFPI = 100+60 = 160.
In 2006, Italy's WFPI = 100-10 = 90, Maltania's WFPI = 90+75 = 165.
In this case, Maltania's WFPI increases from 160 to 165.

Case 3:
In 2005, Italy's WFPI = 20, Maltania's WFPI = 20+60 = 80.
In 2006, Italy's WFPI = 20-10 = 10, Maltania's WFPI = 10+75 = 85.
In this case, Maltania's WFPI increases from 80 to 85.

In both cases, Maltania's WFPI increases by 5 pounds per acre.
Thus, the information in C SUPPORTS the conclusion that Maltania's WFPI increased.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Sun Mar 20, 2016 4:44 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:Premise:
In 2005, Maltania's WFPI was 60 pounds more than Italy's WFPI.
In 2006, Maltania's WFPI was 75 pounds more than Italy's WFPI.
Conclusion:
Between 2005 and 2006, Maltania's WFPI increased.

Case 1:
In 2005, Italy's WFPI = 100, Maltania's WFPI = 100+60 = 160.
In 2006, Italy's WFPI = 10, Maltania's WFPI = 10+75 = 85.
In this case, Maltania's WFPI decreases from 160 to 85.

To support the conclusion that Maltania's WFPI increased, the correct answer will probably show that Case 1 is not possible.

C: Between 2005 and 2006, Italy's WFPI decreased by 10 pounds per acre.
Here, Case 1 is not possible, since in Case 1 Italy's WFPI decreases by 90 pounds per acre.

Case 2:
In 2005, Italy's WFPI = 100, Maltania's WFPI = 100+60 = 160.
In 2006, Italy's WFPI = 100-10 = 90, Maltania's WFPI = 90+75 = 165.
In this case, Maltania's WFPI increases from 160 to 165.

Case 3:
In 2005, Italy's WFPI = 20, Maltania's WFPI = 20+60 = 80.
In 2006, Italy's WFPI = 20-10 = 10, Maltania's WFPI = 10+75 = 85.
In this case, Maltania's WFPI increases from 80 to 85.

In both cases, Maltania's WFPI increases by 5 pounds per acre.
Thus, the information in C SUPPORTS the conclusion that Maltania's WFPI increased.

The correct answer is C.
Hi Mitch,

In Choice A, what does 'same rate' mean? How can I prove that A is wrong?

Thanks

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:37 am
Mo2men wrote:
Hi Mitch,

In Choice A, what does 'same rate' mean? How can I prove that A is wrong?

Thanks
WFPI = (total weight of harvested grain)/(total number of acres).

Premise:
In 2005, Maltanis's WFPI was 60 pounds per acre more than Italy's WFPI.
In 2006, Maltania's WFPI was 75 pounds per acre more than Italy's.

A:
Between 2005 and 2006, the number of acres of wheat planted in both Maltania and Italy increased at the same rate.

2005:
Total weight of harvested grain in Maltania = 1060, total weight of harvested grain in Italy = 1000.
Number of acres in Maltania = 1, number of acres in Italy = 1.
WFPI in Maltania = 1060/1 = 1060.
WFPI in Italy = 1000/1 = 1000.
Difference = 1060-1000 = 60.

2006;
Total weight of harvested grain in Maltania = 200, total weight of harvested grain in Italy = 50.
Number of acres in Maltania = 2, number of acres in Italy = 2.
WFPI in Maltania = 200/2 = 100.
WFPI in Italy = 50/2 = 25.
Difference = 100-25 = 75.

In the case above, the total number of acres in each country DOUBLES (from 1 acre to 2 acres), but the WFPI in Maltania DECREASES (from 1060 to 100).

Thus, A does NOT strengthen the conclusion that the WFPI in Maltania increased.
Eliminate A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3