-
rashmi.kaushal
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 1:57 am
- Thanked: 4 times
Why not "of what"
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction |
- pradeepkaushal9518
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:5 members
-
niksworth
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
- Thanked: 70 times
- Followed by:6 members
1) Ken charges three times the price of what others charge.
2) Ken charges three times the price that others charge.
price of must be followed by a thing.
what others charge is an amount.
So price of what others charge is illogical in that in means price of an amount.
2. corrects this by using relative restrictive clause beginning with that to modify price.
Q) Ken charges three times what price?
A - Three times the price that others charge.
2) Ken charges three times the price that others charge.
price of must be followed by a thing.
what others charge is an amount.
So price of what others charge is illogical in that in means price of an amount.
2. corrects this by using relative restrictive clause beginning with that to modify price.
Q) Ken charges three times what price?
A - Three times the price that others charge.
scio me nihil scire


















