Hi j_shreyans,

This Roman Numeral question can be solved with "brute force"; let's map out the possibilities and look for patterns:

Based on the given information, here's a table of how much money Norman would make (based on the number of bikes sold):

Bikes = Money
0 = 20

1 = 26
2 = 32
3 = 38
4 = 44
5 = 50
6 = 56

7 = 68
8 = 80
9 = 92
10 = 104
11 = 116
12 = 128

13 = 144
14 = 162
Etc. ($18 per additional bike)

We're told that Norman sold X bicycles last week and Y bicycles this week. We also know that he earned MORE THAN TWICE the money he earned in the prior week, so we have to use THAT fact to evaluate what the possibilities could be (within the table).

II. Y > X

Roman Numeral II is easiest, so we'll start there. Since Norman earned MORE MONEY, he had to have sold MORE bicycles. Thus Y MUST be greater than X.
Roman Numeral II is TRUE.

III. Y > 3

Here, we can look at the "top" of the table and talk through the possibilities.

If last week, Norman sold ___ bikes last week, then how many would he need to have sold this week, at the MINIMUM, to make MORE than twice the money?
0 bikes....4 or more bikes were sold
1 bike.....6 or more bikes were sold

The second number will just get bigger and bigger. This proves that Y MUST be greater than 3.
Roman Numeral III is TRUE.

I. Y > 2X

For this Roman Numeral, we can continue the work that we did in Roman Numeral II; we have to look to see whether Y is ALWAYS greater than 2X or not...

2 bikes....7 or more bikes were sold
3 bikes....8 or more bikes were sold
4 bikes....9 or more bikes were sold
At this point, notice the ratio of Y to X is getting smaller....?
5 bikes...10 or more bikes were sold.

This last example PROVES that Y isn't always greater than 2X.
Roman Numeral I is NOT ALWAYS TRUE.

Final Answer: D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich