BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

financial review

Expert replies
by vishalwin » Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:46 am
Because the financial review covered only the fiscal years of July 1992 through June 1994, so the investigators were unable to determine the extent of possibly earlier overpayments.

(A) 1994, so the investigators were unable to determine the extent of possibly
(B) 1994, and the investigators were unable to determine the extent of possibly
(C) 1994, the investigators were unable to determine the extent of possible
(D) 1994, therefore the investigators were unable to determine the extent of possibly.
(E) 1994; therefore, the investigators were unable to determine the extent of possible


I marked E.

Reason: extent of possible is needed (do not know reason but it sounded good to me)

so A,B and D are out.

so/ therefore is needed that's why C is wrong. Please correct my reasoning.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:01 am
There are several possible sentence structures to express causation in English:

A word/phrase such as "because of," "since," or "due to" will make the first clause dependent and the second independent:
BECAUSE x happened, y happened.
DUE TO x, y happened.


Using "so" or "therefore" will make the second clause dependent:
X happened, THEREFORE y happened.
X happened, SO y happened.


We cannot use both BECAUSE and THEREFORE in the same sentence. It's redundant (we imply causation twice), and it creates a sentence fragment (two dependent clauses, but no independent clause).

The correct answer is C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by vishalwin » Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:39 am
Hi,

Can you please explain why extent of possible is preferred over extent of possibly.

I choose "extent of possible" because that sounded good to me. I want to know grammatical reason so that I can remember it when I encounter a questions using same concept.

Thanks & Regards,
Vishal
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Sep 30, 2015 10:47 am
It's dangerous to just rely on what "sounds good" on SC. If we want to determine whether to use an adjective or adverb ("possible" or "possibly"), it has nothing to do with the phrase that comes before it ("extent of"). It depends on what the word is MODIFYING.

If we use the adjective "possible," then it's modifying "overpayments." In other words, it's possible that there were overpayments at an earlier date.

If we use the adverb "possibly," though, then it's modifying the adjective "earlier." In other words, possibly the overpayments were earlier, possibly they were later. This meaning makes a lot less sense.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1