Participle tense (need expert help :( )

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

Participle tense (need expert help :( )

by voodoo_child » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:58 am
It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.
A. It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.
B. It was only after Katharin Graham's becoming publisher of The Wasington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspaper, and under her commandt it had won high praise
C. Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command
D. Moving into the first rank of American newspaper only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command
E. Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command.

OA A

I chose E because of concision. I am confused about the tense of participles.

In the following sentence:

Browsing through the website, I came across Clinton's message.

"Browsing" is a present participle that takes the tense of the main verb, "came across", which is in past tense.

However, in the sentence above, why is that "moving" and "becoming" cannot take past tense of the main verb = "won"?

Please help me :(

Voodoo
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:39 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 39 times
Followed by:22 members
GMAT Score:780

by SticklorForDetails » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:07 pm
I wouldn't approach this with tense issues, since participial tenses are a delicate issue at best, if not a truly subjective one. You are right, "moving" in (E) would take the same tense as the main verb, "won." However, we're not told in the original sentence that these two actions happened simultaneously; AFTER she became publisher in 1963, it moved into the first rank, and separately, while she was in command (sometime?) it won high praise. In fact, the Watergate scandal was ten years later, although you shouldn't have to know this to answer the question. The important thing is that the original sentence does not imply that all the actions (became, moved, won) should happen simultaneously.

Furthermore, the meaning of the original sentences stresses Graham as the cause -- in fact, the only cause -- of both the moving and the winning. (D) and (E) drop this "it was only..." and "it was under her command..." structures, making it seem like a random sequence of events. This loses the meaning of the original sentence.

Finally, remember the "concision" is NOT meant to be a subjective decision or even a decision of length. The definition of "concise" on the GMAT is a sentence that does not use extra words or redundant words. (A) does not have any true wordiness errors. However, (E) contains an awkwardness error: "Graham's becoming," because gerunds should not follow possessives, or be the objects of prepositions.

Learning to distinguish between the style errors that the GMAT believes are objective and the more subjective style errors we are prone to notice is key to success on hard SCs.
Experienced tutors, customized study plans, personalized service.

www.GothamTutors.com/adam.html

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:19 pm
Thanks Adam. Apparently, I didnt understand Stacey's response @
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/kat ... t2120.html

I have asked MGMAT instructor to shed some light. These problems are really confusing for me. I am not sure how i can solve them in 1 minute. :(

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:58 pm
voodoo_child wrote:Thanks Adam. Apparently, I didnt understand Stacey's response @
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/kat ... t2120.html

I have asked MGMAT instructor to shed some light. These problems are really confusing for me. I am not sure how i can solve them in 1 minute. :(
basically, (e) is wrong because it uses a modifier that shouldn't be a modifier.
"moving into the first rank..." and "the WP won high praise..." are two totally different things, so you can't use one of them as a modifier of the other one.
always remember that "modify" isn't some random, meaningless grammatical term -- "modify" actually means that the modifier is giving you more information about the thing it's modifying. i.e., in your example (Browsing through the website, I came across Clinton's message), the modifier is used correctly -- because it actually describes how and when you came across the message.

also, "take the same tense" is necessary, but not sufficient, for these kinds of modifiers.
for these modifiers to work -- these -ING initial modifiers -- they must be describing things that are/were SIMULTANEOUS with the following action. again, examine your example (Browsing through the website, I came across Clinton's message) -- this sentence only works if you actually encountered the message WHILE browsing. i.e., it's not good enough just to have both of these things in the past -- they must have happened simultaneously.
in this sentence, that's not the case; the two events described were not simultaneous.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

• Page 1 of 1