BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

number system

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 29 times
by vipulgoyal » Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:27 pm
For a certain set of numbers, if x is in the set, then x-3 is also in the set. If the number 1 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set.
I. 4
II. -1
III.-5

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II only
E. II and III only

c
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 48 times

by vinay1983 » Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:04 pm
Actually I had committed a mistake while solving this!

It is like this:

if x-3 is in the set, and if x is equal to 1 (note that X is 1 and part of the set!

then x-3=1-3=-2

then x= -2

so x-3= -2-3= -5 and so on

-2 , -5, -8, -11

Hence III is the answer choice.
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:15 am
vinay1983's solution is perfect. The only numbers we can be certain are in the set are -2 , -5, -8, -11 . . . etc


I thought I'd mention that a lot of students make the mistake of reversing the conditional (if-then) statement in this question. The statement says "If if x is in the set, then x-3 is also in the set." Many students mistakenly believe that this also implies that "if x-3 is in the set, then x is also in the set." (these students end up concluding that 4 must be in the set)

This reversal is not logically sound. Here's an example why.

Let's say: If an animal is a rabbit, then that animal has ears.
Can we also conclude that, if an animal has ears then that animal is a rabbit? No.

In our question, the existence of x in the set guarantees the existence of x-3 in the set.
However, it is not necessarily the case that the existence of x-3 in the set guarantees the existence of x in the set.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 48 times

by vinay1983 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:25 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:vinay1983's solution is perfect. The only numbers we can be certain are in the set are -2 , -5, -8, -11 . . . etc


I thought I'd mention that a lot of students make the mistake of reversing the conditional (if-then) statement in this question. The statement says "If if x is in the set, then x-3 is also in the set." Many students mistakenly believe that this also implies that "if x-3 is in the set, then x is also in the set." (these students end up concluding that 4 must be in the set)

This reversal is not logically sound. Here's an example why.

Let's say: If an animal is a rabbit, then that animal has ears.
Can we also conclude that, if an animal has ears then that animal is a rabbit? No.

In our question, the existence of x in the set guarantees the existence of x-3 in the set.
However, it is not necessarily the case that the existence of x-3 in the set guarantees the existence of x in the set.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Thanks!I am all smiles.felt very good to receive a "good" word from you.

Also I want to know in what condition can 4 be also a part of the sequence. THIS QUESTION CAN VERY WELL BE TURNED AROUND!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1