BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is -5 prime , Is (6)^1/2 Even ?

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:50 pm
-5 is not a prime as prime numbers are integers greater than 1.

Even numbers always end with a digit 0, 2, 4, 6, 8. And 6^(1/2) is a decimal so it is not an even number.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by neerajbansal » Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:32 pm
thanks for your answer..
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:29 pm
Another way that I look at prime numbers...

Prime number is a number where only has the number 1 and itself as its factors.

Therefore -5 has factors of -1 and 5, and if you want to include it, 1.

This means that -5 has one factor two many to be prime.
Join the discussion

by ScottD » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:41 am
Factors of -5 could be 1 and -5, which would satisfy the rule of 'factors of 1 and itself'

Is there something I'm forgetting?
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:00 am
"Factors of -5 could be 1 and -5, which would satisfy the rule of 'factors of 1 and itself'

Is there something I'm forgetting?"
That's like saying factors of 20 could be 20 and 1 so 20 is prime.

Just remember that negative numbers can never be prime because the true definition of prime isn't a number with "factors of 1 and itself," but instead a number with "two distinct natural number divisors". A natural number is 1,2,3,4,5..... 0 and neg integers are not natural numbers.

So with -5 what are two unique positive integers other than 0 that can multiply and create -5? You can't do it with just two. The only way is 5*1*-1, which does not satisfy the rule of (1) only two factors and (2) the only two factors of the number must be natural.

This is why 1 is NOT prime. What two UNIQUE natural numbers can you multiply together and get 1? Well you might say 1*1, but they are not unique, they are the same number, so 1 is not prime.

My illustration in the previous post may not be sufficient. But hopefully this clarifies with a bit more definitional jargon.
Join the discussion

by neerajbansal » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:15 am
barcebal --> That's a wonderful explanation...
Join the discussion