BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help!!

Expert replies
by dddanny2006 » Tue Nov 05, 2013 2:38 am
If b is not equal to Zero,and a>b ,is a>c?
(1)(a/b) >(c/b)

(2) 5ab > 6bc

I know why statements 1 and 2 alone cant be sufficient.

Now combining statements 1 and 2

From statement 1,we have a > c----------(1) ,a<c--------------(2) ,we have 2 equations because we dont know whether b is negative or positive


From statement 2,we have 5a>6c----------(3) ,5a<6c-------------(4) ,again we have 2 equations.


If we combine 1 and 3, then a>c.Also combining equations 1 and 4 then indeed a>c

Why cant we combine equations this way?
It gives a whole range of possibilities.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Nov 05, 2013 3:32 am
Is it {E}

b != 0
a>b

To find: a > c?


Statement 1:
a/b > c/b
if b = +ve
then, a>c
if b = -ve
then,a<c
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
5ab > 6bc
if b = +ve
then, 5a > 6c ==> a > 6/5 (c) ==> means a>c
if b = -ve
then, 5a < 6c ==> a < 6/5 (c) ==> we cannot say
INSUFFICIENT

Combining...
We still dont know whether "b" is +ve or -ve
Answer [spoiler]{E}[/spoiler]
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Tue Nov 05, 2013 3:36 am
The equations (1) & (3) are for the cases when "b" is "+ve"

&

The equations (2) & (4) are for the cases when "b" is "-ve"

When we do combining of equations.. we do combination taking care of our assumption. i.e. whether "b" is "+ve" or "-ve" .. cross linking is incorrect.
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:48 am
dddanny2006 wrote:If b is not equal to Zero,and a>b ,is a>c?
(1)(a/b) >(c/b)

(2) 5ab > 6bc
Since b≠0, we can rephrase statement 1 by multiplying each side by b², which must be a POSITIVE value:
b² * (a/b) > b² * (c/b)
ab > bc.

Statement 2 can be rephrased as follows:
ab > (6/5)bc.

The result is that the two statements are almost IDENTICAL.

Case 1: Plug b=1 into both statements
Statement 1: a > c.
Statement 2: a > (6/5)c.
Here, it's possible that c=1 and a=2, in which case a>c.

Case 2: Plug b=-1 into both statements
Statement 1: -a > -c, implying that a < c.
Statement 2: -a > -(6/5)c, implying that a < (6/5)c.
Here, it's possible that c=1 and a=0, in which case a<c.

Thus, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Nov 05, 2013 3:01 pm
Hi dddanny2006,

This type of DS question can be dealt with using algebra skills, Number Properties or TESTing Values. Here's how you can TEST Values...

We're told B not= 0 and A>B. We're asked IF A > C? This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: A/B > C/B

First, an easy set of POSITIVE values:
A=2
B=1
C=1
Is 2>1? YES

Next, something different; NEGATIVE values:
A= -2
B= -3
C= -1
Is -2 > -1? NO

Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: 5AB > 6BC

The great thing about this information is that the TEST CASES that I used in Fact 1 will fit perfectly here too:

A=2
B=1
C=1
YES

A= -2
B= -3
C= -1
NO

Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, I don't need to do any more work. Both sets of values fit both Facts, so I still have a YES and a NO answer.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion