BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Doubt in inequality

Expert replies
by rahulvsd » Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:57 am
Is x negative?
(1) 2x > x^2
(2) x < 1

[spoiler]OA: A. I have a doubt in how we arrive at the answer from statement 1.
Simplifying we get,
x^2 - 2x <0
x(x-2)<0
x<0 x-2<0
x<0 x<2. What am I doing wrong here?[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:01 am
Overthinking it ;)

We know that x^2 is always positive or 0. If 2x is greater than x^2, then x must be positive. If we try x=1/2:

2*(1/2) > (1/2)^2

1 > 1/4

It works. If we trie x=-1/2:

2*(-1/2) > (-1/2)^2

-1 > 1/4

which is not true.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by rahulvsd » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:11 am
Thanks for the reply Bill. But what am I doing wrong in the simplification of Statement 1? Can you help me with that.

Agree the logic you pointed out is easier, but only want to know what's wrong in my method?
Join the discussion

by Pharo » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:33 am
rahulvsd wrote:Is x negative?
(1) 2x > x^2
(2) x < 1

[spoiler]OA: A. I have a doubt in how we arrive at the answer from statement 1.
Simplifying we get,
x^2 - 2x <0
x(x-2)<0
x<0 x-2<0
x<0 x<2. What am I doing wrong here?[/spoiler]
Hey man!

From your rearrangement:
x^2 - 2x <0
x(x-2)<0 ; this statement is correct
x<0 x-2<0 ; now this is missing a crucial construct
x<0 x<2.

Let's restart:
x(x-2) < 0; this means (x < 0) OR (x-2< 0). Think of it. if x<0 AND x-2<0 that means both of the terms are negative and a multiplication of two negative elements is positive; hence your initial inequality is invalid. Now we know that only one statement is right (i.e. : either (x<0) OR (x-2)<0)

Now let's check one by one:
Case 1: x<0 implies that x-2<0 as well.. oops.. this case is not right!
Case 2: x-2<0 --> x<2; this opens up 3 new cases .. (dammit..)
case2a: x<0 ; we know this is not true..
case2b: x = 0; if x = 0 then x*(x-2) = 0; since this contradicts the initial statement, its out.
case2c 0<x<2 ; let's take a number in this range.. x = 0.5 ; 0.5 * (0.5-2) = -0.75; since -0.75<0 this holds.. finally.. we nailed it :P

case2c proves that yes, x is positive. in fact we can even say that it is between 0 and 2 (exclusive)

But as Bill said it.. now this is over thinking it :P
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:37 am
rahulvsd wrote:Is x negative?
(1) 2x > x^2
(2) x < 1

[spoiler]OA: A. I have a doubt in how we arrive at the answer from statement 1.
Simplifying we get,
x^2 - 2x <0
x(x-2)<0
x<0 x-2<0
x<0 x<2. What am I doing wrong here?[/spoiler]
I received a PM requesting that I show how statement 1 can be handled algebraically.

Statement 1: 2x > x^2.
x² - 2x < 0.
x(x-2) < 0.
The critical points are x=0 and x=2.
These are the only values where the lefthand side is equal to 0.
When x is any other value, either 2x > x² or 2x < x².
To determine the range of x, test one value to the left and right of each critical point.

Plug x = -1 into 2x > x²:
-2 > 1.
Doesn't work.
x<0 is NOT part of the range.

We can stop here.
Since x<0 does not satisfy 2x > x², we know that x is not negative.
SUFFICIENT.

If we needed to determine the full range of x, we would proceed as follows:

Plug x=1 into 2x > x²:
2 > 1.
This works.
0<x<2 is part of the range.

Plug x=3 into 2x > x²:
6 > 9.
Doesn't work.
x>2 is NOT part of the range..

The only range that satisfies 2x > x² is 0<x<2.

Statement 2: x<1.
Since could be negative, 0, or a positive fraction, INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion