alcohol

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

alcohol

by nileshdalvi » Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:45 am
Donna: For the most part, medical researchers
agree that someone who regularly consumes large
amounts of alcohol will probably have serious
health problems.
Steve: Heavy drinking does not adversely
impact one's health. My great uncle drank heavily
for years and seemed in perfect health. In fact, he
lived to be 87 years old.
Which one of the following is a major flaw in
Steve's argument?
(A) Steve's argument uses only one example to
attempt to refute a probable, not a foregone,
result.
(B) Steve cites an example that medical
researchers did not study.
(C) Steve's argument implies that there can be no
correlation between heavy drinking and poor
health.
(D) Steve's argument fails to acknowledge the
possibility that his great uncle may not have
been in good health after all.
(E) Steve doesn't indicate how long ago his great
uncle lived so that different medical treatments
can be taken into account.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:30 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by ColumbiaVC » Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:05 am

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:6 members

by gunjan1208 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:22 pm
I shall go with D.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by nileshdalvi » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:47 am
Please provide the reasoning. However, none of the above answers are same as the OA.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:31 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gauravhasija » Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:43 pm
nileshdalvi wrote:Donna: For the most part, medical researchers
agree that someone who regularly consumes large
amounts of alcohol will probably have serious
health problems.
Steve: Heavy drinking does not adversely
impact one's health. My great uncle drank heavily
for years and seemed in perfect health. In fact, he
lived to be 87 years old.
Which one of the following is a major flaw in
Steve's argument?
(A) Steve's argument uses only one example to
attempt to refute a probable, not a foregone,
result.
(B) Steve cites an example that medical
researchers did not study.
(C) Steve's argument implies that there can be no
correlation between heavy drinking and poor
health.
(D) Steve's argument fails to acknowledge the
possibility that his great uncle may not have
been in good health after all.
(E) Steve doesn't indicate how long ago his great
uncle lived so that different medical treatments
can be taken into account.
IMO A

a)Correct
b)Med researchers-Not mentioned
c)Correlation is there Heavy drinking does not adversely
impact one's health
means it affects..though not dversely
d)My great uncle drank heavily
for years and seemed in perfect health
health has been accounted already
e)Medical treatments are out of scope.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by Deepthi Subbu » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:26 pm
IMO A

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:12 am
C
Steve opens his argument by saying "Heavy drinking does not adversely
impact one's health", this implies he believes that there is no correlation between
heavy drinking and poor health

I found A wrong because although Steve uses one example the argument does not mention any
result of the researchers' hypothesis

Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:24 pm
IMO A -- the question related to his uncles' health is already answered. this puts D out of the question.

You cannot use one statement to generalize a particular scenario.

Also the language in Donna's statement uses "most probably" -- means not 100%. there can be exceptions.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:18 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:6 members

by dhonu121 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:48 pm
Concur the most with what A says.
A->Major Weakener.You cannot reject something based on just one example.
B->Yes even this is a weakener.But a small weakener as compared to A.
C->Yes it did.But that's a fact about the argument, not a flaw.
D->No.He said that he was in perfect health.Rejected
E->Not a weakener.Moreover, looks irrelevent.
Please post the OA nilesh.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:21 am
OA is A (LSAT Practice question)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by nileshdalvi » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:54 am
Yes OA is A. Sorry for the late reply.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:25 am
IMO A
This time no looking back!!!
Navami