BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Air Travel--Kaplan

Expert replies

by 786 » Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:07 am
Yes , now that is a tricky thing .
any alternate piece of information that is within the scope of the argument .

The argument here is speaking only about Air travel .
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:09 pm
I would say that B strengthens the argument. It says air travel is dangerous.
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:45 pm
It can't be A......what could be the reasons , it is finally saying that the no. of accidents is increasing.........

B is saying that the increase is one time due to unusual events..........

Pl. comment
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:36 pm
A is good here. Let's say there are 7,000,000 people travel by air. In that case 700 is just 0.01%

If for each other mode of transportation 100 people are traveling and 7 deaths, then also it is 7%, which is more.

Therefore, A is correct
ru2008 wrote:Air Travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the last year there have been seven major collisions resulting in over 700 deaths, more deaths than in any previous year.

Which statement, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. Since the volume of air traffic has been increasing all the time, an increase in the number of deaths due to collisions does not necessarily mean greater danger.

B. The increase in collisions can be explained by statistical coincidence, hijackings, and unusual weather.

C. Mortality per passenger mile is lower for air travel than for any kind of surface transportation.

D. The increase in deaths due to collision in air travel has proceeded at a rate identical to that for deaths in all other major forms of transportation.

E. Last year the average number of passengers per flown plane was significantly lower than that of previous years.


The book reasons that 'E' means more collisions? Can someone please explain why?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by singhpreet1 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:13 am
kvcpk wrote:
786 wrote:We are comparing deaths by air travel only .......... i.e deaths by air travel in two particular years .
So talking about other modes transport becomes irrelevant to the argument !
But in a weaken question, we are allowed to assume that the answer choices are right..
i originally thought it was D too..lets go deeper.

Evidence: seven major collisions resulting in over 700 deaths
Conclusion: Air travel is becoming increasingly dangerous

(A) Since the volume of air traffic has been increasing all the time, an increase in the number of deaths due to collisions does not necessarily mean greater danger. - Correct. Provides an explanation for increase in number of accidents. Percentage of accidents may or may not have changed. (Source: GMAT CLUB)

Preet
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:16 am
reply2spg wrote:A is good here. Let's say there are 7,000,000 people travel by air. In that case 700 is just 0.01%

If for each other mode of transportation 100 people are traveling and 7 deaths, then also it is 7%, which is more.

Therefore, A is correct
ru2008 wrote:Air Travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the last year there have been seven major collisions resulting in over 700 deaths, more deaths than in any previous year.

Which statement, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. Since the volume of air traffic has been increasing all the time, an increase in the number of deaths due to collisions does not necessarily mean greater danger.

B. The increase in collisions can be explained by statistical coincidence, hijackings, and unusual weather.

C. Mortality per passenger mile is lower for air travel than for any kind of surface transportation.

D. The increase in deaths due to collision in air travel has proceeded at a rate identical to that for deaths in all other major forms of transportation.

E. Last year the average number of passengers per flown plane was significantly lower than that of previous years.


The book reasons that 'E' means more collisions? Can someone please explain why?
hi,

it makes sense that the percentage could be lower. Still, if the absolute no. is increasing, the threat is increasing......
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:39 am
Agree with you that threat is increasing. However, threat is increasing with other modes of transportations as well. Threat is not a hard data here, it is hypothtical.

We care about what is mentioned in the passage and what is given in the option.
ansumania wrote:
reply2spg wrote:A is good here. Let's say there are 7,000,000 people travel by air. In that case 700 is just 0.01%

If for each other mode of transportation 100 people are traveling and 7 deaths, then also it is 7%, which is more.

Therefore, A is correct
ru2008 wrote:Air Travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the last year there have been seven major collisions resulting in over 700 deaths, more deaths than in any previous year.

Which statement, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. Since the volume of air traffic has been increasing all the time, an increase in the number of deaths due to collisions does not necessarily mean greater danger.

B. The increase in collisions can be explained by statistical coincidence, hijackings, and unusual weather.

C. Mortality per passenger mile is lower for air travel than for any kind of surface transportation.

D. The increase in deaths due to collision in air travel has proceeded at a rate identical to that for deaths in all other major forms of transportation.

E. Last year the average number of passengers per flown plane was significantly lower than that of previous years.


The book reasons that 'E' means more collisions? Can someone please explain why?
hi,

it makes sense that the percentage could be lower. Still, if the absolute no. is increasing, the threat is increasing......
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by pnk » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:15 pm
ru2008 wrote:Air Travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the last year there have been seven major collisions resulting in over 700 deaths, more deaths than in any previous year.

Which statement, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. Since the volume of air traffic has been increasing all the time, an increase in the number of deaths due to collisions does not necessarily mean greater danger.

B. The increase in collisions can be explained by statistical coincidence, hijackings, and unusual weather.

C. Mortality per passenger mile is lower for air travel than for any kind of surface transportation.

D. The increase in deaths due to collision in air travel has proceeded at a rate identical to that for deaths in all other major forms of transportation.

E. Last year the average number of passengers per flown plane was significantly lower than that of previous years. The book reasons that 'E' means more collisions? Can someone please explain why?
Argument is comparing change in dangerousness of air travel over the years (esp with last year). It say more death this year due to air collision than that in last year. With this background, D says - death due to air collision is identical with other mode of transportation. This could mean, this year both air and other mode of transportation are danagerous. It could still be true that air travel this year has more death (and so become less dangerous) than air tarvel last year. So there is no impact on the argument. So D is out.

IMO A
Join the discussion