BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

need some advice on school selection

Launched January 9, 2010
Expert replies
by RBBmba@2014 » Mon Sep 22, 2014 3:51 am
Hi Veritas Prep,
As far as my research goes, for MBA applicants with RE focus, UCLA has got pretty strong real estate program (I know there are other schools as well in the top 20 with strong or may be stronger RE focused MBA curriculum, but I'm considering it along side those) . However, I've some dilemma in locking it for my apps mostly because of the following -

I don't want to be in Cali post-MBA. Rather I want to be in the South or East Coast, preferably Texas/Georgia(Atlanta)/North Carolina etc.

For a UCLA MBA grad, what are the prospects/chances of getting RE consulting job in East coast or South in the firms such as CBRE,C&W,JLL (and/or in some MC firms,with strong business in RE field, such as Deloitte,PwC,E&Y,McKinsey) ?
If coming out from UCLA, I say that I wanna have a posting in any of the above mentioned states then will that become a hindrance and will they gonna push me into their West coast offices?

So, bottom-line is that considering the above, should I go ahead with UCLA application ?

Would much appreciate your feedback on this!

Looking forward to your thoughts. Thank you.
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask Veritas Prep Admissions Consulting |

by Bryant@VeritasPrep » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:25 pm
These are great questions. Typically, I recommend applicants go for MBA programs in the region or area where they would ideally like to end up working. This actually goes double for real estate on the one hand, since real estate is obviously a local market. The firms you are targeting, however are international real estate firms. For example, I know someone who got their MBA in the US and now works for CBRE overseas in Hong Kong. So on the other hand, you could do well by getting an MBA out West then working for CBRE or others. The rub comes in where you want to live. If you truly want to work in the South, you should think about a program in the area, but the problem is, there aren't too many well known Real Estate programs as compared to New York and Los Angeles. My gut feeling is to prioritize the program if you are targeting international real estate firms then talk the firms into letting you work out of the Atlanta office, for example. Still, you will be far from your network, which may take some convincing for the hiring firm to believe you will be fully effective. I would definitely be reaching out to your target employers for informational interviews now--you can simply ask them what they would prefer to see from graduates. REaching out through linkedin or mutual contacts with friends in the industry would be your best strategy. Someone once told me to never go into a meeting unless you already know the outcome. Similarly, you can "reverse engineer" your post MBA vision if you start with the employer and work backwards to the schools. hope this helps.
Bryant Michaels
MBA Admissions Consultant


Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:59 am
Thank you so much Bryant for your detail reply.

So what I understand from your post -
1.post-Anderson, in RE it could have been difficult to land up with a job in any of the firms mentioned herewith either in East or South coast (re Texas/Georgia(Atlanta)/North Carolina etc.). Right ?

2.Now,this could have been overcome/avoided provided that these firms would be willing to put me in their East/South offices after UCLA. So,first thing would be to getting in touch with 'em and then decide accordingly.

3. Bottom-line is if answer to 2 is NEGATIVE, then strike out UCLA.

Please correct me if I'm wrong or you meant otherwise in any of the above three aspects.

Look forward to hear from you.

P.S: BTW, here we're assuming that what the firms will say now. will stick to it during recruitment at UCLA. Isn't it bit stretched assumption in this context? Thoughts ?
Join the discussion