why whereby is wrong?

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

why whereby is wrong?

by aj5105 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:52 am
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.
(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of
possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to
the document when formally asked to do so
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:20 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mani_mba » Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:39 am
aj5105 wrote:
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.
(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of
possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to
the document when formally asked to do so
Inserting "Whereby" before "Congress" makes the sentence incomplete. i.e. it becomes a fragment.

Do you observe that ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 3:41 am
IMO E

because
"under a provision" conveys what is to be said by using whereby.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:50 pm

Re: why whereby is wrong?

by ur_panacea » Sat Sep 27, 2008 8:41 am
aj5105 wrote:Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.
(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of
possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to
the document when formally asked to do so

IMO E

whereby and under the provision are redundant.

~~G

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:02 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Thanked: 43 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:720

by dumb.doofus » Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:41 pm
I think this question is from OG..
clear and concise. E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

by piyush_nitt » Fri Jan 02, 2009 4:33 pm
Can anyone plz explain that why option E is correct?

I believe sentence "Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied". is a fragment. "Under a provision" is prepositional phrase and that introduces the dependent adjective clause.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: why whereby is wrong?

by logitech » Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:28 pm
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.

WAS vs HAS BEEN ( 3/2 split)
TO DO IT vs TO DO SO (3/2 split )

TO DO SO > TO DO IT

WAS is wrong we need present perfect tense - A, B and C are gone.


(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so[/quote]

Under a provision of the Constitution that has never been applied is an opening modifier which requires the subject at the end in an independent clause.

Whereby distorts this rule and also makes D a dependent clause ( ? )

and I also believe that there needs to be a COMMA before CONGRESS in option E.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

by piyush_nitt » Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:53 pm
Why not A?

why do we need present perfect in the main clause?

Cannot we use 'was' and 'has been' combination as used in sentence A?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:06 pm
piyush_nitt wrote:Why not A?

why do we need present perfect in the main clause?

Cannot we use 'was' and 'has been' combination as used in sentence A?
to do it !!! in option A is one of the big NO's in GMAT!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:33 pm
I agree that "whereby" is redundant if it is advert and that it make a fragment not a sentence if it is a conjuction

But, pls, explain the use of whereby? it is subordinate or coordinate conjuction?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:53 pm
duongthang wrote:I agree that "whereby" is redundant if it is advert and that it make a fragment not a sentence if it is a conjuction

But, pls, explain the use of whereby? it is subordinate or coordinate conjuction?
Whereby can be used instead of by means of or through which.

Learning a language is a process whereby new vocabulary and grammar structures are acquired.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:19 pm
Thanked: 5 times

Re: why whereby is wrong?

by vscid » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:39 pm
aj5105 wrote:Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.
(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of
possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to
the document when formally asked to do so
What question number is this one (from OG)
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:19 pm
Thanked: 5 times

Re: why whereby is wrong?

by vscid » Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:47 pm
logitech wrote:Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.

WAS vs HAS BEEN ( 3/2 split)
TO DO IT vs TO DO SO (3/2 split )

TO DO SO > TO DO IT

WAS is wrong we need present perfect tense - A, B and C are gone.


(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
Under a provision of the Constitution that has never been applied is an opening modifier which requires the subject at the end in an independent clause.

Whereby distorts this rule and also makes D a dependent clause ( ? )

and I also believe that there needs to be a COMMA before CONGRESS in option E.[/quote]

Logitech, what is this 3/2 split , can you explain?
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

Re: why whereby is wrong?

by piyush_nitt » Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:23 am
vscid wrote:
aj5105 wrote:Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention
for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
by the legislatures
of two-thirds of the states.
(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of
possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible
amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible
amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E) has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to
the document when formally asked to do so
What question number is this one (from OG)
OG10 41

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

by piyush_nitt » Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:25 am
logitech wrote:
piyush_nitt wrote:Why not A?

why do we need present perfect in the main clause?

Cannot we use 'was' and 'has been' combination as used in sentence A?
to do it !!! in option A is one of the big NO's in GMAT!
wondering if option A is correct if we modify the ending to "to do so".

Thanks mate!