according vs in accordance : such as vs such X as

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:34 pm
Hi Ron,
i've never seen another store with such a variety of beverages as these ones.
I am a non - native speaker of english and i found this sentence a bit awkward since variety seems to be singlular and you are comparing it with a plural word "these ones "
is the above sentence any different in meaning from the sentence below
i've never seen another store with such a variety of beverages as this one.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:55 am
mundasingh123 wrote:Hi Ron,
i've never seen another store with such a variety of beverages as these ones.
I am a non - native speaker of english and i found this sentence a bit awkward since variety seems to be singlular and you are comparing it with a plural word "these ones "
[/quote]

well, ok, but i hope that you understood the main point of the illustration (i.e., the placement of "such").

i think that the sentence would still be fine, i.e., i'm pretty sure that it's okay to equate "these" with "a variety of beverages".

for instance, there are similar constructions such as a number of, which is pretty much equivalent to "several" -- for instance, a number of dogs were standing on my front porch.
in the same vein, you can also say a large variety of dogs live in the neighborhood -- because it's the dogs, not the variety, that live in the neighborhood.

in any case, this is definitely not something worth worrying about; such writerly differences are not going to be tested on the gmat. the main point of that illustration was the placement of "such"; if you understand that point, then the illustration has served its purpose.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:49 am
Thanked: 1 times

by vidhya16 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:08 am
mooreliberty wrote:
aj5105 wrote:Socially and environmentally responsible investing is on the rise: last year in the United States, over $2 trillion was invested in funds that screen companies according to a variety of criteria such as adherence to labor standards, protection of the environment, and observance of human rights.

A. according to a variety of criteria such as
B. according to a variety of such criteria, as by
C. according to such a variety of criteria as by
D. in accordance with such a variety of criteria as
E. in accordance with a variety of criteria, such as by

what's wrong with A?

spoiler below:





D
My first answer choice was D - it simply sounded correct. Knowing the danger of relying on my ear, I went through this thought process:


My first thought was parallelism... What was invested? Two trillion (noun)... how was it invested? "...was invested in funds..." I was looking for an answer choice that paralleled "invested in." If the prepositional phrase "in funds that screened companies" did not exist, the next prepositional phrase should flow for the most part in the same manner.

So i'm looking for an answer that begins with a preposition, preferably a preposition that does not change the meaning of the sentence ("in" is what I hope to see in the answer choices, but with SC, I know I have to be flexible). Common prepositions are "in," "of," "off," "on," "to," "toward," "with," etc.

In answer choices A and B, "according" and the following prepositional phrase is incorrectly used to describe how these funds screen companies. Prepositional phrases follow an equation: preposition + modifiers (optional) + concludes with a gerund, pronoun, or noun. In A and B, the prepositional phrase is missing the noun, gerund, or pronoun. The prepositional phrase that begins with "according to" is left hanging - it is incomplete without the pronoun "such," which follows yet another preposition "of".

In addition, answer choice A incorrectly uses "such as" to introduce the screening criteria - as it reads, "adherence to labor standards, protection of the environment, and observance of human rights" are merely examples of the screening criteria, rather than the criteria itself.

In answers C & E "by" is used incorrectly as a preposition attempting to link "as" and "adherence to labor standards, protection of the environment, and observance of human rights." "By" splits the verb "as" and the clauses that follow. In addition, "by" is redundant, as it is intended to mean "in accordance with," which is already stated earlier in the sentence.

That leaves choice D.


I hope this is helpful - but I'm no expert. I would appreciate any and all feedback from the great minds of the site re:my analysis and reasoning.
Thats the good thought process. Well done and keep it up.

Vidhya

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:28 am
vidhya16 wrote:Thats the good thought process. Well done and keep it up.

Vidhya
... eeeeeexcept that (a) is the best choice. see my posts on the previous page.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:02 am
lunarpower wrote:
vidhya16 wrote:Thats the good thought process. Well done and keep it up.

Vidhya
... eeeeeexcept that (a) is the best choice. see my posts on the previous page.
LOL
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:08 am

by ecmpec » Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:52 pm
in fact, "in accordance with" is *NOT* used properly in choice (d), since we are talking about the categories of criteria -- i.e., the rules are not specified.

the proper use of "in accordance with" is restricted to following rules, conventions, or established patterns.
so, for instance:

* companies are screened in accordance with criteria such as protection of human rights --> INCORRECT, since no actual rule/convention has been stated here.


Hello Ron,
In the above sentence, "protection of human rights" is a criterion. As you told that "in accordance with" should explicitly state the criterion. Then, it should be correct. Please let me know where i am missing.

Thanks
Rahul

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:52 pm
aj5105 wrote:Socially and environmentally responsible investing is on the rise: last year in the United States, over $2 trillion was invested in funds that screen companies according to a variety of criteria such as adherence to labor standards, protection of the environment, and observance of human rights.

A. according to a variety of criteria such as
B. according to a variety of such criteria, as by
C. according to such a variety of criteria as by
D. in accordance with such a variety of criteria as
E. in accordance with a variety of criteria, such as by

IMO: D