BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

OG 2016 SC 105

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:34 am
Thanked: 2 times

OG 2016 SC 105

by Crystal W » Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:55 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

One of the primary distinctions between our intelligence with that of other primates may lay not so much in any specific skill but in our ability to extend knowledge gained in one context to new and different ones.

A. between our intelligence with that of other primates may lay not so much in any specific skill but
B. between our intelligence with that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill but instead
C. between our intelligence and that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill as
D. our intelligence has from that of other primates may lie not in any specific skill as
E. of our intelligence to that of other primates may lay not in any specific skill but
I understand all other points which need to be considered in this question. My question is about the choice D. The explanation on OG is "without so much, which is used in (C), as seems to introduce a comparison for specific skill rather than a distinction". Can you explain more about the "so much as" and "as"?
Thanks in advance!
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:40 am
Thanked: 57 times
Followed by:2 members

by fabiocafarelli » Thu Mar 17, 2016 3:55 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

1. In option C, the phrase not so much in any specific skill as in our ability uses the form NOT SO + ADJECTIVE (OR ADVERB) + AS. In this case, this form does not introduce a comparison between different things. Rather, it introduces a nuance. It says that a distinction does not really lie in specific skills: it lies in a more general ability.

Here is another example: Some people eat not so much to satisfy hunger as to avoid it. In other words, the objective of eating is not really one thing but rather another. The sentence distinguishes between two objectives but does not really compare them.

2. In option D, on the other hand, the phrase not in any specific skill as in our ability seems to want to make a (quite inept) comparison between SKILL and ABILITY, as the Official Guide suggests - though of course if such a comparison really were the objective here, it would have to be made differently. The construction in option D does not succeed in making the comparison that the OG points to.

3. I think that a simpler way to look at this would be to say that NOT ... AS should be NOT ... BUT: this construction would then be grammatically correct and would provide a comparison, but in doing so would alter the meaning of the sentence as expressed in option A and in the correct option.

If you like this post, please click on the THANK icon.

You can also visit us at https://www.xgmat.com/
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:50 am
Thanked: 11 times

by thang » Sun Mar 20, 2016 12:07 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

there is no distiction from
distinction between a and b

is idiom
looking for the girl living in Bradford UK, visiting Halong bay, Vietnam on 26- 27 Jan 2014. all persons, pls, forward this message to all persons you know to help me find her: my email: [email protected], call: 84904812758
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 20, 2016 3:22 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Crystal W wrote:My question is about the choice D. The explanation on OG is "without so much, which is used in (C), as seems to introduce a comparison for specific skill rather than a distinction". Can you explain more about the "so much as" and "as"?
Thanks in advance!
D: One of the primary distinctions our intelligence has...may lie not in any specific skill.
Conveyed meaning:
In all likelihood, our intelligence has a distinction not attributable to any specific skill.

OA: One of the primary distinctions between our intelligence and that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill as in our ability to extend knowledge.
Conveyed meaning:
In all likelihood, our superior intelligence can be attributed MORE to our ability to extend knowledge THAN to any specific skill.

D does not convey the intended comparison.
Eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:34 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Crystal W » Mon Mar 21, 2016 1:47 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

GMATGuruNY wrote:
Crystal W wrote:My question is about the choice D. The explanation on OG is "without so much, which is used in (C), as seems to introduce a comparison for specific skill rather than a distinction". Can you explain more about the "so much as" and "as"?
Thanks in advance!
D: One of the primary distinctions our intelligence has...may lie not in any specific skill.
Conveyed meaning:
In all likelihood, our intelligence has a distinction not attributable to any specific skill.

OA: One of the primary distinctions between our intelligence and that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill as in our ability to extend knowledge.
Conveyed meaning:
In all likelihood, our superior intelligence can be attributed MORE to our ability to extend knowledge THAN to any specific skill.

D does not convey the intended comparison.
Eliminate D.
Thank you so much!
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:34 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Crystal W » Mon Mar 21, 2016 1:48 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

fabiocafarelli wrote:1. In option C, the phrase not so much in any specific skill as in our ability uses the form NOT SO + ADJECTIVE (OR ADVERB) + AS. In this case, this form does not introduce a comparison between different things. Rather, it introduces a nuance. It says that a distinction does not really lie in specific skills: it lies in a more general ability.

Here is another example: Some people eat not so much to satisfy hunger as to avoid it. In other words, the objective of eating is not really one thing but rather another. The sentence distinguishes between two objectives but does not really compare them.

2. In option D, on the other hand, the phrase not in any specific skill as in our ability seems to want to make a (quite inept) comparison between SKILL and ABILITY, as the Official Guide suggests - though of course if such a comparison really were the objective here, it would have to be made differently. The construction in option D does not succeed in making the comparison that the OG points to.

3. I think that a simpler way to look at this would be to say that NOT ... AS should be NOT ... BUT: this construction would then be grammatically correct and would provide a comparison, but in doing so would alter the meaning of the sentence as expressed in option A and in the correct option.

If you like this post, please click on the THANK icon.

You can also visit us at https://www.xgmat.com/
Thank you so much!
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 2:27 pm
Followed by:8 members

by [email protected] » Thu Apr 11, 2019 2:46 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one issue at a time, and narrow it down to the correct answer quickly! To start, here is the original question with any major differences between the options highlighted in orange:

One of the primary distinctions between our intelligence with that of other primates may lay not so much in any specific skill but in our ability to extend knowledge gained in one context to new and different ones.

(A) between our intelligence with that of other primates may lay not so much in any specific skill but
(B) between our intelligence with that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill but instead
(C) between our intelligence and that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill as
(D) our intelligence has from that of other primates may lie not in any specific skill as
(E) of our intelligence to that of other primates may lay not in any specific skill but

After taking a quick look over the options, here are some things we can focus on to narrow down our choices:

1. between / our intelligence has / of our intelligence (Wordiness/Meaning)
2. with / and / from / to (Idioms/Meaning)
3. lay / lie (Word Usage/Meaning)
4. but / but instead / as (Word Usage/Idioms)

#3 on our list (lay vs. lie) will eliminate 2-3 options right away, so let's start there. Lay and lie are tricky to remember, even for native English speakers, so here is a refresher:

Lay = to put down or place an object (I will lay my book down on the desk.)
Lie = to rest or recline (I will lie in bed until I feel better.)

When in doubt, replace the word "lay" or "lie" with it's intended meaning. If it works, you're using the right word. If it doesn't, then you'll need to change it. Here is how it would work in this sentence:

Lay = One of the primary distinctions between our intelligence with that of other primates may put not so much in any specific skill but in our ability to extend knowledge gained in one context to new and different ones.

Lie = One of the primary distinctions between our intelligence with that of other primates may rest not so much in any specific skill but in our ability to extend knowledge gained in one context to new and different ones.

(A) between our intelligence with that of other primates may lay not so much in any specific skill but
(B) between our intelligence with that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill but instead
(C) between our intelligence and that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill as
(D) our intelligence has from that of other primates may lie not in any specific skill as
(E) of our intelligence to that of other primates may lay not in any specific skill but

We can eliminate options A & E because they use the word "lay" instead of "lie."

Next, let's focus on #1 and #2 on our list because they go together. We need to make sure we're using idioms correctly and using concise language whenever possible.

(B) between our intelligence with that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill but instead

This is INCORRECT because the idiom "between X from Y" is wrong. It should be "between X and Y."

(C) between our intelligence and that of other primates may lie not so much in any specific skill as

This is CORRECT! It uses the correct idiom structure "between X and Y."

(D) our intelligence has from that of other primates may lie not in any specific skill as

This is INCORRECT because it uses an incorrect idiom! The appropriate idiom structure here would be either "distinction between X and Y" or "distinction of X from Y." This sentence uses "distinction X has from Y," which is wrong.


There you have it - option C is the correct choice! It uses "lie" instead of "lay" and uses proper idiom structures!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1