-
iongmat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 5:14 am
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
I am currently reading "Powerscore CR Bible". In an example, it says:
People who read a lot are more intelligent than other people. Thus reading must cause a person to be intelligent.
Now "Powerscore CR Bible" goes further and claims that each of the following is an assumption in this argument:
a) Sleeping more than 8 hours does not cause a person to be intelligent.
b) Regular exercise does not cause a person to be intelligent.
c) Genetics do not cause a person to be intelligent.
Each of these does weaken the argument, but I am not understanding how these are "assumptions" in the argument.
If the argument had been that that reading is the "only way" for a person to be intelligent, then I could have understood that each of the above would have been an assumption
People who read a lot are more intelligent than other people. Thus reading must cause a person to be intelligent.
Now "Powerscore CR Bible" goes further and claims that each of the following is an assumption in this argument:
a) Sleeping more than 8 hours does not cause a person to be intelligent.
b) Regular exercise does not cause a person to be intelligent.
c) Genetics do not cause a person to be intelligent.
Each of these does weaken the argument, but I am not understanding how these are "assumptions" in the argument.
If the argument had been that that reading is the "only way" for a person to be intelligent, then I could have understood that each of the above would have been an assumption












