BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

PLS LET ME know the OA

Expert replies
by jeegarm » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:28 pm
Q11:
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters
of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in
Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of
legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is
therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster
illegally that year.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of
catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased
steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed
lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than
9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats
went out of business between 1992 and 1996.
Answer:
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by wizardofwashington » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:01 pm
B??
A falling tree resounds... but a forest grows in silence...
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:50 am
A

It's removing the alternative explanation.
Join the discussion


by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:49 am
I agree with you guys. I also think that the right answer is A.
Join the discussion