2 CR Questions

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

2 CR Questions

by heshamelaziry » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:33 pm
1)At an enormous research cost, a leading chemical company has developed a manufacturing process for converting wood fibers into a plastic. According to the company, this new plastic can be used for, among other things, the hulls of small sailboats. But what does the company think sailboat hulls used to be made of? Surely the mania for high technology can scarcely go further than this.

The author's opinion of the manufacturing process described in the passage is based primarily on the fact that

(A) plastic is unlikely to be durable enough for high-quality sailboat hulls
(B) the research costs of developing
the process outweigh any savings possible from the use of the plastic

(C) a small sailboat is not normally regarded as a high-tech product

(D) hulls for small sailboats can be made from wood without converting it into plastic

(E) many other spheres of human activity are in far greater need of technological research




2)The earth's resources are being depleted much too fast. To correct this, the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

(A) New resource deposits are constantly being discovered.

(B) The United States consumes one-third of all resources used in the world.

(C) Other countries need economic development more than the United States does.

(D) Other countries have agreed to hold their resource consumption at present levels.

(E) The United States has been conserving resources for several years.


No OAs. Please provide explanations as much as possible.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:44 am
1. I think it is D, if the hulls are anyway made from wood, that explains the mania the author is talking about.

2.I think it is D. It doesn't help if only the US keeps the consumption constant. It has to be all the countries using the resources.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:28 am

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:59 am
Thanked: 25 times

by mp2437 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:57 am
I agree with gmatmachoman:
1. D
2. B

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:33 am
Thanked: 35 times

by NikolayZ » Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:10 am
1)D

Also agree with 2)B =)
Firstly, i felt like picking D. But it would be the correct answer choice for "on what the argument depends" question i think.
Surely, 1/3 of world consumption of the USA will strengthen the argument.