Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Absolute Value

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies

by Svedankae » Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:38 am
doclkk wrote:
mike22629 wrote: But again, right now - i'm way more confused and it seems that another northern california person is too.
Hah sorry buddy, in case you were referring to me, i hate to say that im not from northern cal... but you were at least right about the confused part.



Is there nobody here who can explain what this problem is really asking?
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:25 am
Okay, I will try one more time, and if it does not work, just ask Ian. Absolute value DOES measure distance

So for example

l5l = distance from 5 to 0
l-5l = distance from -5 to 0

BUT
when TWO terms are inside of an absolute value sign, they must be subtracted from one another to find the distance between them.

SO

lx+yl = 6, that is NOT the distance inbetween x and y because they are being added. This is the distance of x from 0 PLUS the distance of y from 0.

Look at it visually

Say x = 4, y =2

----------------------0---------y-----------------

----------------------0--------------------------------x---

So the total distance is both of these lines added together

----------------------0-----------------------------------------------(x+y)

But the distance between x and y is 2, therefore lx+yl does not equal distance between x and y, it equals the distance between x and NEGATIVE y
NOW
If you flip either y or x as negative..

--------y-------------0------------------------------------x

You can see that the distance between x and y is actually equal to lx+yl because even though they are not at the same points, the distance is the same.
Join the discussion

by doclkk » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:53 am
mike22629 wrote:Okay, I will try one more time, and if it does not work, just ask Ian. Absolute value DOES measure distance

So for example

l5l = distance from 5 to 0
l-5l = distance from -5 to 0

BUT
when TWO terms are inside of an absolute value sign, they must be subtracted from one another to find the distance between them.

SO

lx+yl = 6, that is NOT the distance inbetween x and y because they are being added. This is the distance of x from 0 PLUS the distance of y from 0.

Look at it visually

Say x = 4, y =2

----------------------0---------y-----------------

----------------------0--------------------------------x---

So the total distance is both of these lines added together

----------------------0-----------------------------------------------(x+y)

But the distance between x and y is 2, therefore lx+yl does not equal distance between x and y, it equals the distance between x and NEGATIVE y
NOW
If you flip either y or x as negative..

--------y-------------0------------------------------------x

You can see that the distance between x and y is actually equal to lx+yl because even though they are not at the same points, the distance is the same.
I got it now

So distance of X from 0 and Distance of Y from 0. Sum the distances.

Got it. Very clear explanation. =)

Sorry about the trouble, I went to public school. =)
Join the discussion

by Svedankae » Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:29 pm
mike22629 wrote:Okay, I will try one more time, and if it does not work, just ask Ian. Absolute value DOES measure distance

So for example

l5l = distance from 5 to 0
l-5l = distance from -5 to 0

BUT
when TWO terms are inside of an absolute value sign, they must be subtracted from one another to find the distance between them.

SO

lx+yl = 6, that is NOT the distance inbetween x and y because they are being added. This is the distance of x from 0 PLUS the distance of y from 0.

Look at it visually

Say x = 4, y =2

----------------------0---------y-----------------

----------------------0--------------------------------x---

So the total distance is both of these lines added together

----------------------0-----------------------------------------------(x+y)

But the distance between x and y is 2, therefore lx+yl does not equal distance between x and y, it equals the distance between x and NEGATIVE y
NOW
If you flip either y or x as negative..

--------y-------------0------------------------------------x

You can see that the distance between x and y is actually equal to lx+yl because even though they are not at the same points, the distance is the same.
I want to thank you and everyone else who has answered in this thread. unfortunately after reading it over and over again, i still havent quite figured it out. i always thought of me as having a very solid math background (i come from germany and we kinda take math seriuosly ;)) and i also understand the idea of absolute value, but somehow this question is just not clicking. i think the main problem is that i dont really see the sense in this question

i would be extremely grateful if someone would add me on skype and maybe explain it to me via a phone call.. my nick is mostawesomect

thanks!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:06 am
i'll try to make this simpler.

the ABSOLUTE VALUE OF A DIFFERENCE represents distance.
absolute values of other things don't.

therefore, if you can express the absolute value as | THIS - THAT |, where THIS and THAT are two quantities, then it's a distance between THIS and THAT.

here you go:

|x + y|
this does NOT have the above form, so, right now, it doesn't represent a distance at all.

BUT
you can rewrite it in any of the following three forms:
|x - (-y)| --> therefore it's the distance between x and (-y)
|y - (-x)| --> therefore it's the distance between y and (-x)
|(x+y) - 0| --> therefore it's the distance between (x+y) and 0

(nb: none of these 3 rewrites has anything to do with absolute value craziness; all three of x - (-y), y - (-x), and (x+y) - 0 can readily be seen to be equal to x + y. instead, the issue is "how do i write x + y as a DIFFERENCE?" because only DIFFERENCES, not sums, represent distances in this context.)

it has nothing to do with the distance between x and y, since you can't express it with |x - y|.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by Sprite_TM » Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:57 am
i am confuse too!!

why can't you just do this x + |y| = 6.

since Y is negative, you just put absolute value on Y.

and are you saying this is a fact?

|x| + |y| = |x + y| but i always thought when you put absolute values, it is like this

|x +y| = -x-y or x + y but Y is negative, so it doesnt make sense
Join the discussion