BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Value

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:30 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:750

by Svedankae » Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:38 am
doclkk wrote:
mike22629 wrote: But again, right now - i'm way more confused and it seems that another northern california person is too.
Hah sorry buddy, in case you were referring to me, i hate to say that im not from northern cal... but you were at least right about the confused part.



Is there nobody here who can explain what this problem is really asking?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:56 pm
Thanked: 24 times
GMAT Score:710

by mike22629 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:25 am
Okay, I will try one more time, and if it does not work, just ask Ian. Absolute value DOES measure distance

So for example

l5l = distance from 5 to 0
l-5l = distance from -5 to 0

BUT
when TWO terms are inside of an absolute value sign, they must be subtracted from one another to find the distance between them.

SO

lx+yl = 6, that is NOT the distance inbetween x and y because they are being added. This is the distance of x from 0 PLUS the distance of y from 0.

Look at it visually

Say x = 4, y =2

----------------------0---------y-----------------

----------------------0--------------------------------x---

So the total distance is both of these lines added together

----------------------0-----------------------------------------------(x+y)

But the distance between x and y is 2, therefore lx+yl does not equal distance between x and y, it equals the distance between x and NEGATIVE y
NOW
If you flip either y or x as negative..

--------y-------------0------------------------------------x

You can see that the distance between x and y is actually equal to lx+yl because even though they are not at the same points, the distance is the same.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:46 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 5 times

by doclkk » Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:53 am
mike22629 wrote:Okay, I will try one more time, and if it does not work, just ask Ian. Absolute value DOES measure distance

So for example

l5l = distance from 5 to 0
l-5l = distance from -5 to 0

BUT
when TWO terms are inside of an absolute value sign, they must be subtracted from one another to find the distance between them.

SO

lx+yl = 6, that is NOT the distance inbetween x and y because they are being added. This is the distance of x from 0 PLUS the distance of y from 0.

Look at it visually

Say x = 4, y =2

----------------------0---------y-----------------

----------------------0--------------------------------x---

So the total distance is both of these lines added together

----------------------0-----------------------------------------------(x+y)

But the distance between x and y is 2, therefore lx+yl does not equal distance between x and y, it equals the distance between x and NEGATIVE y
NOW
If you flip either y or x as negative..

--------y-------------0------------------------------------x

You can see that the distance between x and y is actually equal to lx+yl because even though they are not at the same points, the distance is the same.
I got it now

So distance of X from 0 and Distance of Y from 0. Sum the distances.

Got it. Very clear explanation. =)

Sorry about the trouble, I went to public school. =)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:30 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:750

by Svedankae » Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:29 pm
mike22629 wrote:Okay, I will try one more time, and if it does not work, just ask Ian. Absolute value DOES measure distance

So for example

l5l = distance from 5 to 0
l-5l = distance from -5 to 0

BUT
when TWO terms are inside of an absolute value sign, they must be subtracted from one another to find the distance between them.

SO

lx+yl = 6, that is NOT the distance inbetween x and y because they are being added. This is the distance of x from 0 PLUS the distance of y from 0.

Look at it visually

Say x = 4, y =2

----------------------0---------y-----------------

----------------------0--------------------------------x---

So the total distance is both of these lines added together

----------------------0-----------------------------------------------(x+y)

But the distance between x and y is 2, therefore lx+yl does not equal distance between x and y, it equals the distance between x and NEGATIVE y
NOW
If you flip either y or x as negative..

--------y-------------0------------------------------------x

You can see that the distance between x and y is actually equal to lx+yl because even though they are not at the same points, the distance is the same.
I want to thank you and everyone else who has answered in this thread. unfortunately after reading it over and over again, i still havent quite figured it out. i always thought of me as having a very solid math background (i come from germany and we kinda take math seriuosly ;)) and i also understand the idea of absolute value, but somehow this question is just not clicking. i think the main problem is that i dont really see the sense in this question

i would be extremely grateful if someone would add me on skype and maybe explain it to me via a phone call.. my nick is mostawesomect

thanks!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members
Thanked: 2256 times
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:06 am
i'll try to make this simpler.

the ABSOLUTE VALUE OF A DIFFERENCE represents distance.
absolute values of other things don't.

therefore, if you can express the absolute value as | THIS - THAT |, where THIS and THAT are two quantities, then it's a distance between THIS and THAT.

here you go:

|x + y|
this does NOT have the above form, so, right now, it doesn't represent a distance at all.

BUT
you can rewrite it in any of the following three forms:
|x - (-y)| --> therefore it's the distance between x and (-y)
|y - (-x)| --> therefore it's the distance between y and (-x)
|(x+y) - 0| --> therefore it's the distance between (x+y) and 0

(nb: none of these 3 rewrites has anything to do with absolute value craziness; all three of x - (-y), y - (-x), and (x+y) - 0 can readily be seen to be equal to x + y. instead, the issue is "how do i write x + y as a DIFFERENCE?" because only DIFFERENCES, not sums, represent distances in this context.)

it has nothing to do with the distance between x and y, since you can't express it with |x - y|.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:45 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Sprite_TM » Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:57 am
i am confuse too!!

why can't you just do this x + |y| = 6.

since Y is negative, you just put absolute value on Y.

and are you saying this is a fact?

|x| + |y| = |x + y| but i always thought when you put absolute values, it is like this

|x +y| = -x-y or x + y but Y is negative, so it doesnt make sense
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply