BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Value Confusion

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:18 am
If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0

anybody have a solution for this (under 2 minute). testing value takes way too long here.


E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by theCodeToGMAT » Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:55 am
|a| > |b|

if a is +ve ==> a>b
if a is -ve ==> a<-b

To find: a |b| < a - b

Statement 1:
a < 0
that means 'a' is negative
a<-b ==> a - (-b) < 0
"a" & "b" can have any value and also maybe "b" is 0
So, we cannot say whether a|b| is zero
INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
ab >= 0
a & b have same sign or either one of them is "0"
if a is positive, (a-b) > 0
if a is negative, (a - (-b)) < 0
we cannot say whether a|B| is "0"
INSUFFICIENT


Combining...
a<0
ab >=0
-- a is negative
-- b is negative or "0"
So, a<-b ==> a - (-b) < 0
again, we cannot say a|b| is "0" or not.
INSUFFICIENT

Answer [spoiler]{E}[/spoiler]
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:57 pm
Hi shibsriz,

This DS question is perfect for TESTing Values. You just have to keep your tests SIMPLE (and by simple, I mean that you should TEST small values whenever possible, including, -1, 0, 1):

We're told that A and B are integers and |A| > |B|. We're asked: Is A|B| < A - B? This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: A < 0

A = -1
B = 0
The answer to the question is NO

A = -2
B = -1
The answer to the question is YES
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: AB >= 0
**Notice how BOTH TEST cases from Fact 1 fit into Fact 2??? This is a HUGE shortcut**

A = -1
B = 0
The answer to the question is NO

A = -2
B = -1
The answer to the question is YES
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, the same sets of Values fit BOTH Facts, so we have a NO and a YES answer.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Mathsbuddy » Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:06 am
[email protected] wrote:If a and b are integers, and |a| > |b|, is a · |b| < a - b?

(1) a < 0

(2) ab >= 0

anybody have a solution for this (under 2 minute). testing value takes way too long here.


E
You could try this, but it still takes a few minutes:


As |a| > |b| and |a| < 0, then |b| < 0 too


Now we can limit our testing:

If we let |a| = p + k, |b| = p, then a = -(p + k) and b = -p where p > 0, k > 0 are unknown.

So, looking at the question "is a*|b| < a - b?"

The LHS is a · |b| = -(p + k)*p = -p(p + k)
and the RHS is a - b = -(p + k)--p = -k

So the question becomes: is -p(p + k) < -k ?

Add k to both sides:

-p^2 - kp + k < 0

p^2 + kp - k > 0 (changing sign changes the inequality symbol)

Solve:

p -> [-k +/- SQRT(k^2 + 4k)]/2 which is real and solvable; so it is possible. Integer solutions are findable.

However, the quadratic curve will intersect the p axis to define acceptable and unacceptable ranges.

Therefore it is unsufficient.
Join the discussion