BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

factor problem

Expert replies
by Castor.kim » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:23 pm
This is simple but not easy factor problem..
certainly, these problems no so hard to solve, but it takes too much time to solve..

how can I decrease the time spending.. in these problem?

* is "n" a factor of 24 ?

1) 3n is a factor of 48
2) 5n is a factor of 60

OA is B

and I was to take the gmat exam yesterday, the following problem was given to me.. (exactly same)
someone who take an exam Nov, it may emerge in exam :)

* If n is a positive integer, and r is a reminder when (n-1)(n+1) is divided by 24.
what is the value of "r"?

1) 2 is not a factor of n
2) 3 is not a factor of n

the answer is C (it's my choice)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:35 pm
Castor.kim wrote:This is simple but not easy factor problem..
certainly, these problems no so hard to solve, but it takes too much time to solve..

how can I decrease the time spending.. in these problem?

* is "n" a factor of 24 ?

1) 3n is a factor of 48
2) 5n is a factor of 60

OA is B
1) Since any factor of 24 will also be a factor of 48, we really only have to look at the factors that are unique to 48: 16 and 48. 3n cannot be 16 because n would then be a fraction. 3n could be 48, would would make n 16. 16 is not a factor of 24. We can easily see that n could be a factor of 24; if 3n=6, then n=2. Insufficient.

2) Here, we only have to look at factors of 60 that are multiples of 5: 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60. If we factor out a 5 to leave us with n, we can see that n could be 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, or 12, all of which are factors of 24. Sufficient.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:34 am
Castor.kim wrote:
Is n a factor of 24?

1) 3n is a factor of 48
2) 5n is a factor of 60

OA is B
IMPORTANT: I'll assume that n must be a positive integer. This restriction would likely appear with this question.

Target question: Is n a factor of 24?

For both statements, we can use the following rule:
If D is a divisor (factor) of N, then N = kD for some integer k

Statement 1: 3n is a factor of 48
Applying the above rule, we can say that 48 = 3nk for some integer k.
If we divide both sides by 3, we see that 16 = nk
So, we can be certain that n is a factor of 16, which means n may or may or may not be a factor of 24. Consider these two cases:
Case a: n = 8, in which case n is a factor of 24
Case b: n = 16, in which case n is not a factor of 24
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: 5n is a factor of 60
Applying the above rule, we can say that 60 = 5nk for some integer k.
If we divide both sides by 5, we see that 12 = nk
So, we can be certain that n is a factor of 12.
If n is a factor of 12, then n must be a factor of 24 (since 12 is a factor of 24)
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by JoeMartian » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:14 pm
Hi Kim,

The timing used to be a big challenge for me on these problems as well. The reason was that my go-to strategy was picking numbers. While that strategy is often quite effective, a problem with larger numbers like this one can make it too time consuming. What do we do?

It turns out the world of divisibility is quite similar to the world of Transformers.... primes are all powerful! They will be our key to moving through divisibility problems with a consistent and quick process.

'Is n a factor of 24?'

Let's get to our primes! 24 = 2*2*2*3. For n to be a factor of 24, n can have no more than three 2s and one 3; it can have nothing else. The question translates to "Does n have three or fewer 2s and one or fewer 3s in its prime factors?'

1) 3n is a factor of 48.... it's prime time! 48 = 2*2*2*2*3
So 3n can have no more than four 2s and no more than one 3.
Therefore, this statement translates to "n has four or fewer 2s."
Not Sufficient

2) 5n is a factor of 60... primes! 60 = 2*3*5
So 5n can have no more than one 2, one 3, and one 5.
Therefore, this statement translates to "n has no more than one 2 and one 3."
Sufficient

Answer B

We don't often think of numbers as a product of their primes, so it can feel unnatural at first. However, it's a very useful approach to a wide array of questions, and with a little practice, it's quite fast as well.
Join the discussion