BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Line Segments

Expert replies
by student22 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:10 am

Code: Select all

If P, Q, and R are three distinct points, do line segments PQ and PR have the same length?

(1) P is the midpoint of line segment QR.
(2) Q and R lie on the same circle with center P.

I got A for this one, but the official answer is D.

Did I misread the question, because I drew a diagram for statement 2, and it's not sufficient. The question doesn't specifically say that they have to lie on the outside of the circle....or did it and I just misread it? Please take a look. Thanks.

Image
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by djkvakin » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:13 am
for 2 it says that they lie on the circle, and that means that the distance from the center to the circle equals to the radius and therefore is the same.
In your diagram you put the points inside the circle
Join the discussion

by student22 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:18 am
Thanks, that's what I wanted to figure out, so "on the circle" ALWAYS means on the circumference of the circle?

Just for future reference, how would they have phrased the question to allow the points to be both inside the circle AND on the circumference? I don't want to misinterpret the question by accident on the test.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:30 am
student22 wrote:Thanks, that's what I wanted to figure out, so "on the circle" ALWAYS means on the circumference of the circle?

Just for future reference, how would they have phrased the question to allow the points to be both inside the circle AND on the circumference? I don't want to misinterpret the question by accident on the test.
on the circle will always mean on the circumference of the circle

"Either on the circle or inside the circle" will be the apt statement for referring the points to be both inside the circle AND on the circumference

GMAT Never is ambiguous so, don't worry; it will never trick you with ambiguity, that being said, do not overlook the statements or take them for granted.
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by student22 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:33 am
Got it, thanks for clarifying it for me! I tend to over think some of these data sufficiency questions.
Join the discussion