In the grid of dots above, each dot has equal vertical &

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members
Image
In the grid of dots above, each dot has equal vertical & horizontal spacing from the others. A small 45-45-90 triangle is drawn. Counting this triangle, how many triangles congruent to this one, of any orientation, can be constructed from dots in this grid?
A. 112
B. 120
C. 240
D. 448
E. 480


For a complete solution to this problem, as well as discussion of hard counting problems in general, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/difficult- ... -problems/

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Source: — Problem Solving |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:49 pm
There are 7+6+....+1 unit squares = 7/2 * (7+1) = 28 using Sum = n/2 * (n + 1)
Within each square there are four different possible (rotated) orientations of the congruent triangle.
Also, there are 8 more congruent triangles along the hypotenuse.

Total = 28 * 4 + 8 = 120

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

by vipulgoyal » Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:15 pm
shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
Attachments
connecting dots.docx
(22.18 KiB) Downloaded 121 times

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:01 am
vipulgoyal wrote:shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
Hi there,

That's what I thought when I first saw the question, but the key adjective is "CONGRUENT" which basically means "exactly the same shape and size". If the question had said "SIMILAR" triangles then all the 45-45-90 triangles would need to be considered like you say. If it just said triangles (i.e. not necessarily congruent/similar) then there would be plenty more triangular choices.

I hope this helps :)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:11 am
vipulgoyal wrote:shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
According to me, if the question had said "Similar"

Total single cube based = (7)(8)/2 = 28 ==> 28*4 + 8 = 120

Total 4 cube based square = (5)(6)/2 = 15 ==> 15*4 + 7 = 67

total 9 cube based square = (3)(4)/2 = 6 ==> 6*4 + 6 = 30

Total 16 cube based square = 1 cube ==> 1*4 + 5 = 9

Total = 226
Last edited by theCodeToGMAT on Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
R A H U L

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:17 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
vipulgoyal wrote:shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
We need congruent triangle with 45-45-90 measurement.. if you are trying to make those triangle in the shaded region then you are again considering those triangles.

If we scan each point on the left most column and consider possible 45-45-90 triangles, then:

(8)(9)/2 = 36
(7)(8)/2 = 28
(6)(7)/2 = 21
(5)(6)/2 = 15
(4)(5)/2 = 10
(3)(4)/2 = 6
(2)(3)/2 = 3
(1)(2)/2 = 1
= 120....
I'm not sure I know what you mean.
Congruent triangles must be the SAME SIZE.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:18 am
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Image
In the grid of dots above, each dot has equal vertical & horizontal spacing from the others. A small 45-45-90 triangle is drawn. Counting this triangle, how many triangles congruent to this one, of any orientation, can be constructed from dots in this grid?
A. 112
B. 120
C. 240
D. 448
E. 480


For a complete solution to this problem, as well as discussion of hard counting problems in general, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/difficult- ... -problems/

Mike :-)
Nice question Mike! I agree with Mathsbuddy's approach and answer. It saves time that's the essence.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:20 am
Mathsbuddy wrote:
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
vipulgoyal wrote:shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
We need congruent triangle with 45-45-90 measurement.. if you are trying to make those triangle in the shaded region then you are again considering those triangles.

If we scan each point on the left most column and consider possible 45-45-90 triangles, then:

(8)(9)/2 = 36
(7)(8)/2 = 28
(6)(7)/2 = 21
(5)(6)/2 = 15
(4)(5)/2 = 10
(3)(4)/2 = 6
(2)(3)/2 = 3
(1)(2)/2 = 1
= 120....
I'm not sure I know what you mean.
Congruent triangles must be the SAME SIZE.
Yep, i was just restating what's present in the question; Mike has stated that drawn triangle is "45-45-90" ;)
R A H U L

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:22 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
vipulgoyal wrote:shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
We need congruent triangle with 45-45-90 measurement.. if you are trying to make those triangle in the shaded region then you are again considering those triangles.

If we scan each point on the left most column and consider possible 45-45-90 triangles, then:

(8)(9)/2 = 36
(7)(8)/2 = 28
(6)(7)/2 = 21
(5)(6)/2 = 15
(4)(5)/2 = 10
(3)(4)/2 = 6
(2)(3)/2 = 3
(1)(2)/2 = 1
= 120....
We need congruent triangles of the size mentioned in the dots. But, you're lucky on this occasion, Rahul. Read this in the stem, 'how many triangles congruent to this one'.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:25 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
Mathsbuddy wrote:
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
vipulgoyal wrote:shouldnt we need to consider additional trangles in shaded squres in the attached file,
my take

120 + {4+8+12+16+20(trangles formed within those squres formed by joining three verticle and three horiz dots)+6(from right side trangles) + 4+8+12 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining four verticle and four horiz dots)+3(from right side trangles)+ 4 (trangles formed within those squres formed by joining five verticle and five horiz dots)+1(from right side trangles)

[spoiler] 120 + 78 = 198 not in option [/spoiler]
We need congruent triangle with 45-45-90 measurement.. if you are trying to make those triangle in the shaded region then you are again considering those triangles.

If we scan each point on the left most column and consider possible 45-45-90 triangles, then:

(8)(9)/2 = 36
(7)(8)/2 = 28
(6)(7)/2 = 21
(5)(6)/2 = 15
(4)(5)/2 = 10
(3)(4)/2 = 6
(2)(3)/2 = 3
(1)(2)/2 = 1
= 120....
I'm not sure I know what you mean.
Congruent triangles must be the SAME SIZE.
Yep, i was just restating what's present in the question; Mike has stated that drawn triangle is "45-45-90" ;)
I see. Yes similar or congruent shapes must have the same angles. Congruent shapes must have the same length of side too.

See https://www.math.com/school/subject3/les ... 3L1GL.html

:)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:25 am
sanju09 wrote: We need congruent triangles of the size mentioned in the dots. But, you're lucky on this occasion, Rahul. Read this in the stem, 'how many triangles congruent to this one'.
Oh yes, I mixed congruent with Similar Triangle.....
R A H U L

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:31 am
Ignore this message!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

by vipulgoyal » Fri Nov 22, 2013 1:23 am
if it would be similar, it would be more intresting :?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:45 am
vipulgoyal wrote:if it would be similar, it would be more intresting :?
According to me, if the question had said "Similar"

Total single cube based = (7)(8)/2 = 28 ==> 28*4 + 8 = 120

Total 4 cube based square = (5)(6)/2 = 15 ==> 15*4 + 7 = 67

total 9 cube based square = (3)(4)/2 = 6 ==> 6*4 + 6 = 30

Total 16 cube based square = 1 cube ==> 1*4 + 5 = 9

Total = 226
R A H U L

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:25 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mathsbuddy » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:26 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
vipulgoyal wrote:if it would be similar, it would be more intresting :?
According to me, if the question had said "Similar"

Total single cube based = (7)(8)/2 = 28 ==> 28*4 + 8 = 120

Total 4 cube based square = (5)(6)/2 = 15 ==> 15*4 + 7 = 67

total 9 cube based square = (3)(4)/2 = 6 ==> 6*4 + 6 = 30

Total 16 cube based square = 1 cube ==> 1*4 + 5 = 9

Total = 226
Indeed it would be much more interesting, but too complicated for GMat as there are more than 226 similar triangles available! In the attached diagram I have shown a pink alternative similar 45-45-90 triangle in various orientations and 2 sizes. The green triangle introduces the fact that even more orientations of 45-45-90 triangle are possible. There's a challenge for you! :)
Attachments
Similar.jpg
More similar triangles for a non-congruent question