another good weaken question!!!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

another good weaken question!!!

by [email protected] » Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:04 am
Recently in City X, developers have stopped buying land, contractors have found themselves going without work for longer periods, and banks have issued fewer mortgages. There must be fewer new residents moving to City X than there were previously.

Which of the following indicates a flaw in the reasoning above?

A] This year several housing blocks have gone on the market after being held up for months by legal red tape.

B] The average size of a new home has increased significantly over the past several years.

C] Re-sales of condominiums have increased over the past six months.

D] The cost of materials such as lumber and cement has decreased over the past year.

E] Sales of other big-ticket items, such as automobiles and boats, has remained steady over the past year.



The given OA is A.



Remember guyzzzz... all these questions that I am posting, are official GMATPREP questions.
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:37 am
Can somebody explain how A is better than C?[/b]
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:07 am
I think I can see why A is better. Here is my reasoning:

Suppose the city has 100 houses, including apartments, villas, and condos; all occupied.

As per C re-sale of condos has increased. Say 20 condos are being re-sold. It does not guarantee that buyer will be an outsider. It could be that other residents of city are buying these condos. So this option does not necessarily point out the flaw in the reasoning.

But A says that new buildings (unoccupied) have gone to the market. So, that means that buyer should be an outsider. Even if the residents of the city buy those apartments, their old houses will be unoccupied and would need new residents to move into the city.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 307
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:45 pm
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:700

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:46 am
A very nice explanation by Stacey Koprince from Manhattangmat


A) This says some housing was built but wasn't actually sold because there was some legal red tape. But now, all of a sudden, the legal issues have been worked out and all of these houses come on the market at once. That oversupply could explain why there's a bit of a lull in the building market - there are already a lot of houses sitting there waiting to be sold.


I liked this question. Thanks for posting!