Traveling In A Triangle of Points

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 7:46 am
Followed by:1 members

Traveling In A Triangle of Points

by EOV » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:40 am
Hi everybody,

John is trying to get from point A to point C, which is 20 miles away directly to the northeast; however the direct road from A to C is blocked and John must take a detour. John must travel due north to point B and then drive due east to point C. How many more miles will John travel due to the detour than if he had traveled the direct 20 mile route from A to C?

(1) The ratio of the distance going north to the distance going east is 4 to 3
(2) The distance traveled north going the direct route is 16

(A) Statement (I) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (II) alone is not sufficient
(B) Statement (II) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (I) is not sufficient
(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement alone is sufficient
(D) Each statement ALONE is sufficient
(E) Statements (I) and (II) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient

Correct answer (?)
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:56 am
The question sets up a right triangle for us, with the route north from A to B and the route east from B to C being the legs, and the direct route from A to C being the hypotenuse. We know the distance of the hypotenuse, so all we need is either AB or BC to be able to find the difference in distance.

S1 tells us that we have a 3/4/5 triangle, so we can easily determine AB and BC. Sufficient.

S2 tells us that AB is 16, which will allow us to find BC by using the Pythagorean theorem. Sufficient.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:58 am

by mamathak » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:13 am
on what basis can we assume that ABC is a right angle triangle. John would have travelled too less or too more due north either reducing AB or increasing AB to an extent that it is not right triangle?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:54 am
mamathak wrote:on what basis can we assume that ABC is a right angle triangle. John would have travelled too less or too more due north either reducing AB or increasing AB to an extent that it is not right triangle?
Due north from A to B implies vertical distance: |
Due east from B to C implies horizontal distance: --->
Thus, if John travels due north from A to B and then due east from B to C, AB and BC will form a right angle:

B ------->C
|
|
|
|
A
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3