Very tricky DS question

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:13 am
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

Very tricky DS question

by rakeshd347 » Thu Oct 03, 2013 6:16 pm
Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?

(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was.
(2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000.

OA coming soon.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Thu Oct 03, 2013 7:07 pm
Hi rakeshd347,

This DS question has several unknowns that we need to keep track of (and a "quirk" that you need to notice to avoid choosing one of the wrong answers).

We're asked how much money Laura earned. We're told that her pay is $1,000 + C dollars per set of encyclopedias (ABOVE her sales target of N sets). So, we need to know C and how many she sold above N.

Fact 1 tells us that 3 fewer sets sold = $600. The catch is that we don't know if she "made money" on each of the 3 sets of books. It might be that 1 or 2 of the sets were part of her "target" (so she didn't make any money on those sets).

Since her total would have been $600 less, that means that one of the 3 options occurred:
1 set "counted" and made her $600
2 sets "counted" and made her $300 each
3 sets "counted" and made her $200 each

It's possible that she only sold $600 above her target, but it's also possible that she made more than that (if all 3 sets "counted", then she could have made more money than the $600.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2 tells us that selling 10 sets would lead to an income ABOVE $4,000 (the $1,000 + the extra money). We run into a similar problem here: we don't know how many of those sets "made her money." Since $4,000 is > $1,000, we know that she sold some number of sets above her "target" (and made some extra money), but we don't know how many. Also, we don't know how much money each set earned her.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combining facts, we have an interesting Number Property...
From Fact 1, we know that the extra money made above her target is either $200/set, $300/set or $600/set.
From Fact 2, we know that if she sold 10 sets, those sets made her OVER $3,000 in additional money.

If a set made her only $200 more, then she would never make OVER $3000, so this option is NOT POSSIBLE
If a set made her only $300 more, then she would never make OVER $3000, so this option is NOT POSSIBLE
So, a set MUST make her $600 more, as long as it's not part of the "target"

This means that since only 1 of the 3 sets (mentioned in Fact 1) would get her extra money, any of the sets that she sold BEFORE those sets would have been part of the "target" (and also would not have gotten her any extra money). So, she only sold 1 set above her target, at $600/set....

Her pay would have been $1000 + $600 = $1600

Final Answer:

C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 03, 2013 7:32 pm
Laura sells encyclopaedias, and her monthly income has two components, a fixed component of $1000, and a variable component of $C for each set of encyclopaedias that she sells in that month over a sales target of n sets, where n>0. How much did she earn in March?

(1) If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was.
(2) If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000
The first n sets do not earn a bonus.

Statement 1: If Laura had sold three fewer sets in March, her income for that month would have been $600 lower than it was.
Case 1: 1 set earned a bonus of $600, and the remaining n sets did not earn a bonus.
Case 2: 2 sets each earned a bonus of $300, and the remaining n sets did not earn a bonus.
Case 3: 3 sets each earned a bonus of $200, and the remaining n sets did not earn a bonus.
Case 4: More than 3 sets each earned a bonus of $200, and the remaining n sets did not earn a bonus.
In any of these cases, selling 3 fewer sets would decrease the total income by $600.
No way to determine the total income.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: If Laura had sold 10 sets of encyclopaedias in March, her income for that month would have been over $4000
Since the first n sets earn a total of $1000, the total bonus earned by the remaining sets is more than $3000.
The minimum value of c -- the bonus earned by each set sold after the first n sets -- occurs if n=1, with the result that 9 of the 10 sets here each earn a bonus.
If 9 sets here each earn a bonus of c dollars, we get:
9c > 3000
c > 333.33.
No way to determine the total income.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Since c > 333.33, only Case 1 above is viable:
1 set earned a bonus of $600, and the remaining n sets did not earn a bonus.
Thus:
Total income = base income + bonus = 1000 + 600 = 1600.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3