Archaeologists in Ireland believe that

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 8:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:740

Archaeologists in Ireland believe that

by commit.gmat » Tue May 19, 2009 8:04 pm
Archaeologists in Ireland believe that a recently discovered chalice, which dates from the eighth century, was probably buried [u]to keep from[/u] being stolen by invaders.

(A) to keep from
(B) to keep it from
(C) to avoid
(D) in order that it would avoid
(E) in order to keep from


Can anyone explain why C is wrong?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Tue May 19, 2009 8:11 pm
I would go with [spoiler](C)[/spoiler].

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: Ohio, US
Thanked: 6 times

by blackarrow » Tue May 19, 2009 8:27 pm
My answer is B

'it' is importnat here as it provides clarity to what was buried.

option C is therefore not right
Its better to burn out than to fade away

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:40 am
Location: Hyderabad

by preetosh » Tue May 19, 2009 8:31 pm
Hi IMO is B

Agree with you regarding importance of 'it'


OA please ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:34 am
Thanked: 305 times
Followed by:55 members
GMAT Score:760

by myohmy » Tue May 19, 2009 8:32 pm
I would use POE here.

We can eliminate A (original sentence) since it's obviously wrong. We can also eliminate C and E, because they indicate that it is the chalice doing the avoiding/keeping from -- ie, indicating that the chalice is keeping itself safe, which is obviously nonsensical. D is unnecessarily wordy.

So I'd go with B.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Tue May 19, 2009 8:39 pm
(C) - 'chalice was buried'

Could you please take a second look at (C) and explain why it's not the answer?

myohmy wrote:I would use POE here.

We can eliminate A (original sentence) since it's obviously wrong. We can also eliminate C and E, because they indicate that it is the chalice doing the avoiding/keeping from -- ie, indicating that the chalice is keeping itself safe, which is obviously nonsensical. D is unnecessarily wordy.

So I'd go with B.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:34 am
Thanked: 305 times
Followed by:55 members
GMAT Score:760

by myohmy » Tue May 19, 2009 8:48 pm
If C were correct the sentence would read:

"A chalice ... was probably buried to avoid being stolen by invaders."

In this case, it's not clear what "avoid" refers to. We assume that someone buried the chalice ("was buried") though we're not given info as to whom. The way the sentence reads now, it could indicate that the chalice was buried to allow the buriers to avoid being stolen by intruders. Without a pronoun making it clear that it is the chalice we're talking about, the sentence is unclear.

I'm not 100% on this one, but that's my take on it.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Wed May 20, 2009 12:14 pm
Received a PM asking me to respond specifically as to the issue with C.

as myohmy mentions, if C were correct, it would read "a chalice was buried to avoid being stolen..."

The chalice was buried by someone else, right? (That is, it did not bury itself. :)) That's why the sentence is in passive form: "was buried."

The "to avoid" part - is that something that the chalice is doing? Nope. Someone else wants to prevent it from being stolen, right? So, a person can do something to avoid something else. Or a person can prevent something from happening to an object. Or an object can have something done to it to prevent something else from happening to it. But this sentence (with choice C) says that the object has something done to it in order to avoid something else happening to it. The problem here is that the object cannot avoid having something else happen to it - the object is passive. Either a person is doing something to avoid something else, or an object is having something done to it to prevent something else from happening to it.

I'd generally chalk this up to idiom, except that it's not quite an idiom - it's more language usage and the real test generally tries to avoid that kind of stuff as much as possible nowadays because they are trying to reduce the bias against non-native speakers. So I wouldn't worry too much about this one.

Curious - where did this one come from? It seems like a generally well-written question but out of date. Maybe from an old paper test or just a really old question from a test-prep company?
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

• Page 1 of 1