janxavier wrote:
A recently published paper concludes that tenured professors or those on their way to tenure don't enhance student learning as much as full-time lecturers outside the tenure system. Clearly, the difference between professors in the tenure system and other full-time lecturers has to do with the reward system for the former. The criterion for rewarding tenured faculty typically places a greater emphasis on research than teaching.
The above argument is based on doubts on the validity of which of the following statements?
A. A tenured professor is expected to spend greater time on research activities than on teaching.
B. Non-tenured full time lecturers are rewarded more for the research that they do than for their teaching assignments.
C. The universities are bound by the law to continue with their existing reward systems.
D. Generally, a tenured professor is much more experienced than a non-tenured full time lecturer.
E. No non-tenured professor focuses more on the research activities than teaching in order to become tenured.
Premise:
Tenured professors don't enhance student learning as much as full-time lecturers outside the tenure system.
Conclusion: Non-tenured professors are better with students because
the criterion for rewarding tenured faculty typically places a greater emphasis on research than teaching.
To justify the conclusion, the passage assumes that one of the five answer choices is UNTRUE.
B:
Non-tenured full time lecturers are rewarded more for the research that they do than for their teaching assignments.
If this answer choice is true, then both types of professors -- tenured and non-tenured -- are rewarded more for their research than for their teaching assignments, invalidating the conclusion that non-tenured professors are better with students because
the criterion for rewarding tenured faculty typically places a greater emphasis on research than teaching.
Since
B invalidates the conclusion, the passage assumes that answer choice
B is UNTRUE.
The correct answer is
B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at
[email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3