Prime number

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:7 members

Prime number

by vinay1983 » Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:33 pm
If P is a prime number, then which of the following COULD be the sum of the factors of P?

1. 2P-1 2. P+1 3. P^2-1

A. 2 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 1 only
E. 1,2 and 3
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Source: — Problem Solving |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:13 am
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by rakeshd347 » Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:42 pm
vinay1983 wrote:If P is a prime number, then which of the following COULD be the sum of the factors of P?

1. 2P-1 2. P+1 3. P^2-1

A. 2 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 1 only
E. 1,2 and 3
I think answer should be E.
Prime number only have 2 factors itself and 1. But as we have 2 as a prime number then we could have 1and 3 true as well.
2 has 2 factors 2 and 1. sum of the factors is 3. and hence all the 3 conditions are met. As it is a COULD be true questions so we can have answer E. If it were must be true then the answer will be A
Last edited by rakeshd347 on Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:46 am
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:7 members
GMAT Score:730

by faraz_jeddah » Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:44 pm
vinay1983 wrote:If P is a prime number, then which of the following COULD be the sum of the factors of P?

1. 2P-1 2. P+1 3. P^2-1

A. 2 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 1 only
E. 1,2 and 3
I will go with E

P + 1 is obvious

If P = 2 then sum of factors is 1+2 = 3
P^2 - 1 = 2^2 - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3

same goes for 2P - 1
A good question also deserves a Thanks.

Messenger Boy: The Thesselonian you're fighting... he's the biggest man i've ever seen. I wouldn't want to fight him.
Achilles: That's why no-one will remember your name.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 283
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 11:56 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 97 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:750

by ganeshrkamath » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:22 am
vinay1983 wrote:If P is a prime number, then which of the following COULD be the sum of the factors of P?

1. 2P-1 2. P+1 3. P^2-1

A. 2 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 1 only
E. 1,2 and 3
Take the prime number 2.
Sum of its factors = 1+2 = 3
2(2) - 1 = 3
2 + 1 = 3
2^2 - 1 = 3
Choose E

In general,
Sum of factors of a number = (a^(n+1) - 1)/(a-1) * (b^(m+1) - 1)/(b-1) * ...
where a,b,.. are the prime factors of the number.
and n,m,.. are their respective powers.

Example: 6 = 2*3
Sum of factors of 6 = (2^(1+1)-1)/(2-1) * (3^(1+1)-1)/(3-1)
= (3/1) * (8/2) = 12


Cheers
Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with excellence.

Kelley School of Business (Class of 2016)
GMAT Score: 750 V40 Q51 AWA 5 IR 8
https://www.beatthegmat.com/first-attemp ... tml#688494

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:58 am
vinay1983 wrote:If P is a prime number, then which of the following COULD be the sum of the factors of P?

1. 2P-1 2. P+1 3. P^2-1

A. 2 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 1 only
E. 1,2 and 3
Picking numbers is a great way to go here.
Another option is to recognize that, if P is a prime number, then 1 and P are its ONLY factors.
So, the sum of the factors of P MUST EQUAL P + 1

Statement I: 2P - 1
Is it possible for the sum of the factors to be 2P - 1?
To find out, we'll set this equal to P + 1 to get . . .
2P - 1 = P + 1
Solve, to get P = 2
So, when P = 2, the sum of the factors is 2P - 1 (as well as P + 1)
Statement I can be true

Statement II: P + 1
P + 1 = P + 1, so statement II MUST be true

Statement III: P² - 1
Set this equal to P + 1 to get . . .
P² - 1 = P + 1
Rearrange: P² - P - 2 = 0
Factor: (P - 2)(P + 1) = 0
Solve, to get P = 2 or P = -1 [-1 is not prime, so we won't consider it]
So, when P = 2, the sum of the factors is P² - 1 (as well as P + 1)
Statement III can be true

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:7 members

by vinay1983 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:10 am
So if i am right we are supposed to calculate/arrive at whether the statements "could be true" and not necessarily "must be true"
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:11 am
vinay1983 wrote:So if i am right we are supposed to calculate/arrive at whether the statements "could be true" and not necessarily "must be true"
That's right.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:24 am
Notice that, if we set each answer choice equal to P + 1 (as I did in my solution above), we can handle much trickier statements.
For example, COULD P² - 4P - 13 be the sum of the factors of P?
What about P² - 7P - 15?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:16 pm
Hi vinay1983,

What is the source for this question? I only ask because it doesn't follow the typical GMAT style for Roman Numeral questions (which would ask "what MUST be true?"), it can be beaten by using the easiest number possible (the number 2, without testing the thoroughness of your knowledge) and doesn't have any of the "frequency shortcuts" that are typical of Roman Numeral questions. Roman Numeral questions on the GMAT are usually a bit more "involved" than this question.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image