BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

1000CR - Test B- Q16

Expert replies
by Carol » Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:47 am
Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.
(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.
(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.
(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.
(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.


Could you please post your answers + reasoning. ty :wink:
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

reply

by raunekk » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:15 am
is it A???
Join the discussion

by Carol » Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:43 am
yes. would you mind to explain your reasoning?
Join the discussion

by TrizMA » Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:26 am
it's A.

Conclusion: "ligitation explosion" has sky rocketted the cost

Opposing Argument: no of succesful cases & average damages given have almost remained same.

This mean the cost can increase because of legal cost on unsuccesful cases. "A" supports conclusion i.e increase in cost because of litigation
Join the discussion

Re: 1000CR - Test B- Q16

by nitin86 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:31 am
Carol wrote:Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.
(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.
(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.
(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.
(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.


Could you please post your answers + reasoning. ty :wink:
Author's assumption -> Unsuccessful suites do no harm to business.

<A> weaken that....
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 12:34 am
I think A is the right answer here
Join the discussion