BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Whats the answer?

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:08 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

Whats the answer?

by gmatrant » Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:35 pm
Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in the press reports.

A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them

OA is C while I chose answer as [spoiler]A.(isnt this subjunctive)[/spoiler]
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:12 pm

by yxhh2008 » Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:07 am
I pick up A
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:08 pm
Thanked: 1 times

yeah

by maverick2007 » Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:41 pm
I go with A too.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:12 pm

by yxhh2008 » Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:56 pm
oh, the OA is C, can someone explains why use "are not used"? how to use "on condition that"?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:16 pm
It can't be A because "they" is ambiguous -- could be referring to either the company or the specific people who spoke. Same reason why E can't be correct. So you should be choosing between B, C, and D. B is in future tense, and the example sentence is in past tense, so that can't be right. D is wrong because the idiom goes "on the condition that..." The best answer is C.

I sympathize with everyone picking A though, because this one is hard, and none of the answer choices given are the way I would have corrected the sentence.
Verbal Tutor
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:08 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmatrant » Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:50 pm
Danielle wrote:It can't be A because "they" is ambiguous -- could be referring to either the company or the specific people who spoke. Same reason why E can't be correct. So you should be choosing between B, C, and D. B is in future tense, and the example sentence is in past tense, so that can't be right. D is wrong because the idiom goes "on the condition that..." The best answer is C.

I sympathize with everyone picking A though, because this one is hard, and none of the answer choices given are the way I would have corrected the sentence.
Danielle,
how can 'they' refer to 'the company', isnt 'the company' singular... hmm..quite confused.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:36 pm
Sorry, the word company is singular in American English and should be treated that way grammatically. However, sometimes a company is referred to in vernacular English as "they". That however, does not signify, just trying to explain how I read it.

My bad. Thanks for catching that G'rant.
Verbal Tutor
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:12 pm

by yxhh2008 » Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:40 am
it seems that the only way to explain why A is wrong is that the useage of subjunctive mood after "on condition that" is wrong, ha?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:35 am
The subjunctive mood is not the best way to express the meaning of the sentence. I was looking at it (again), and it occured to me that "to name" someone can mean several things:

1) that you actually bestow a name on them (ex: you were lucky to be named after your father)

2) that you mention, identify, or accuse someone (ex: Richard was to clever to be named as one of the thieves)

Maybe it's also that answer A is somewhat ambiguous in meaning. Answer C is clearing saying that names would be not be used in the reports, where answer A uses the "be named" construction, which has more than one meaning.
Verbal Tutor
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:12 pm

by yxhh2008 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:16 am
thank you, Danielle
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:27 pm

Re: Whats the answer?

by dingo001 » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:35 pm
gmatrant wrote:Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in the press reports.

A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them

OA is C while I chose answer as [spoiler]A.(isnt this subjunctive)[/spoiler]
My problem with A, is "that they", who is they.. is that the missing modifier press reporter?

I chose C, 'condition of X' idiom too
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:55 am

by john83.amar » Tue Sep 02, 2014 6:12 am
My guess was A, but official answer is C. Can anyone explain why A is wrong?
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1