BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is Fred taller than Wilma?

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:18 am
Is Fred taller than Wilma?

(1) Fred is taller than Barney.

(2) Wilma is taller than Betty, who is taller than Barney.

What's the best way to determine whether statement 1 is sufficient?

OA E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:47 pm
lheiannie07 wrote:Is Fred taller than Wilma?

(1) Fred is taller than Barney.

(2) Wilma is taller than Betty, who is taller than Barney.

What's the best way to determine whether statement 1 is sufficient?

OA E
(1) Fred is taller than Barney.

No information about Wilma. Insufficient.

(2) Wilma is taller than Betty, who is taller than Barney.

=> Wilma is taller than Barney. But we do not have any information about Fred. Insufficient.

(1) and (2) combined:

From both the statements, we get that Fed and Wilma are taller than Barney, but we cannot compare between Fred and Wilma. Insufficient.

The correct answer: E

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Barcelona | Manila | Melbourne | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:19 pm
lheiannie07 wrote:Is Fred taller than Wilma?

(1) Fred is taller than Barney.
(2) Wilma is taller than Betty, who is taller than Barney.
Target question: Is Fred taller than Wilma?

Statement 1: Fred is taller than Barney.
No information about Wilma is given, so there's no way to answer the target question.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: Wilma is taller than Betty, who is taller than Barney.
No information about Fred is given, so there's no way to answer the target question.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
The COMBINED statements are not sufficient.
To see why, consider these two conflicting that satisfy both statements:
Case a: the people, arranged from shortest to TALLEST are: Barney, Betty, Wilma, Fred. In this case Fred IS taller than Wilma
Case b: the people, arranged from shortest to TALLEST are: Barney, Betty, Fred, Wilma. In this case Fred is NOT taller than Wilma
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion