-
amysky_0205
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:53 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:5 members
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
OA: A
can someone explains all to me~ tks a lot
and how to use "owe to"?
i narrowed down to A, C and D.
a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
OA: A
can someone explains all to me~ tks a lot
and how to use "owe to"?
i narrowed down to A, C and D.
