BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

DS

Expert replies
by mandeepak » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:30 am
Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| &#8800; 0

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jangojess » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:42 am
stmt 1 - there can be two solutions for x in this case.
x+1 =2(x-1)...... x= 3.
x+1 =2(1-x)....when modulus is used both conditions of difference need to be considered....In this case x = 1/3.....Since x has two values ...Insuff

stmt 2 - x not equal to 3 is the sol.....Insuff

Both - the only possible sol is x=1/3....Suff ...........So ans is C.
Trying hard!!!
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:49 am
can you pls confirm the answer. Thanks
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:25 am
Hi

Can some one pls help me whit this one?

This is the way I solved statement 1)

lx+1l = 2lx-1l

so there are two options

Option 1)

(x+1) = 2 (x-1), in which case x = 3

Option 2)

-(x+1) = -2(x-1), in which case X = 3

Both the cases X > 1, so statement 1 is sufficient

However Jess has a diff ans. Can any one confirm the right approach and explain it?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by ua » Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:23 pm
Hi ri2007,


Your option 1 is the same as the option 2.

When we have a modulus on a side that means it can have two values +/-. When there is a modulus on both sides that means that both sides will have a +/-

|x+1| = 2|x-1|

+/- (x+1) = +/- (2(x-1))

which leads to the following options:

x+1 = 2(x-1) or -(x+1) = - 2(x-1) (they are same)

AND

-(x+1) = 2(x-1) or x+1 = -2(x-1) (they are same as well)
Join the discussion

by ri2007 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:30 pm
Thanks so much us. Great explaination
Join the discussion