If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of highly processed foods and excelling at sports is purely coincidental.
A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of
B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating
C) IF Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of
D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating
E) Should Dr.Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating.
The OE says that 'excelling' is a participle!! Can't believe this. According to me, 'excelling', as used here, is a pure Gerund. Can someone explain to me how GMAT defines 'participle'?
btw, the correct answer is D and I don't have any issues with that.
A) If Dr. Wade was right, any apparent connection of the eating of
B) Should Dr. Wade be right, any apparent connection of eating
C) IF Dr. Wade is right, any connection that is apparent between eating of
D) If Dr. Wade is right, any apparent connection between eating
E) Should Dr.Wade have been right, any connection apparent between eating.
The OE says that 'excelling' is a participle!! Can't believe this. According to me, 'excelling', as used here, is a pure Gerund. Can someone explain to me how GMAT defines 'participle'?
btw, the correct answer is D and I don't have any issues with that.
