Estimation Question

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

Estimation Question

by saadishah » Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:05 am
This is an OG question for which explanation is given. I tried applying the explanation on a smaller set however it doesn't work (for me). So either I do not follow the explanation or am trying to apply it to a wrong set. Please help me learn the principles that are used in the explanation so that I can solve a similar question myself next time.

Q. M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300, inclusive. Which of the following is true?

A. 1/3 < M < 1/2
B. 1/5 < M < 1/3
C. 1/7 < M < 1/5
D. 1/9 < M < 1/7
E. 1/12 < M < 1/9
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 03, 2015 3:16 am
M is the sum of reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300 inclusive. which of the following is true?

A. 1/3 < M < 1/2
B. 1/5 < M < 1/3
C. 1/7 < M < 1/5
D. 1/9 < M < 1/7
E. 1/12 < M < 1/9
If all of the 100 values were 1/300, the result would be the following sum:
100(1/300) = 1/3.
Since all but one of the values are actually GREATER THAN 1/300, the value of M must be GREATER THAN 1/3.

If all of the 100 values were 1/200, the result would be the following sum:
100(1/200) = 1/2.
Since all of the values are actually LESS THAN 1/200, the value of M must be LESS THAN 1/2.

Thus:
1/3 < M < 1/2.

The correct answer is A.

Similar problem:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ps-not-able- ... 81645.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:04 am
Hi saadishah,

In this prompt, the answer choices are "ranges"; this usually means that there's a way to avoid doing lots of math and instead use patterns and logic to save you time.

Mitch's already pointed out the easiest way to figure out the minimum and maximum values of the sum of the reciprocals. You can actually stop working once you figure out the minimum though:

Since 1/300 < 1/201 and the sum of those 100 terms would be 1/3 AT THE MINIMUM, the only answer that's possible would be A. The extra work that Mitch did just confirms the maximum value of the sum, but it's unnecessary.

As you continue to study, be mindful of how the answer choices are written - they can sometimes provide a huge hint into the fastest way to answer the question.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:15 am
M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300 inclusive. Which of the following is true?
A) 1/3 <M 1/2
B)1/5<M<1/3
C)1/7 <M< 1/5
D) 1/9 < M < 1/7
E) 1/12 <M< 1/9
We want to find 1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + . . . + 1/299 + 1/300

NOTE: there are 100 fractions in this sum.

Let's examine the extreme values (1/201 and 1/300)

First consider a case where all of the values are equal to the smallest fraction (1/300)
We get: 1/300 + 1/300 + 1/300 + ... + 1/300 = 100/300 = 1/3
So, the original sum must be greater than 1/3

Now consider a case where all of the values are equal to the biggest fraction (1/201)
In fact, let's go a little bigger and use 1/200
We get: 1/200 + 1/200 + 1/200 + ... + 1/200 = 100/200 = 1/2
So, the original sum must be less than 1/2

Combine both cases to get 1/3 < M < 1/2 = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:39 am

by bhoglund » Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:23 pm
All the explanations provided so far have been very helpful! Another way to solve this problem is as follows:

- Numerator: There are 100 fractions in the set. All of them have a numerator of 1, so 1 x 100 = 100.
- Denominator: The average value of all the denominators in the set is 250.5. (201+300)/2 = 250.5.

Then simplify 100/250.5 to 1/2.505.

1/3 < 1/2.505 < 1/2

The answer is A.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 8083
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 43 times
Followed by:29 members

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:55 am
saadishah wrote:

Q. M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300, inclusive. Which of the following is true?

A. 1/3 < M < 1/2
B. 1/5 < M < 1/3
C. 1/7 < M < 1/5
D. 1/9 < M < 1/7
E. 1/12 < M < 1/9
Let's first analyze the question. We are trying to find a potential range for M in which M is the sum of the reciprocals from 201 to 300, inclusive. Thus, M is:

1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + ...+ 1/300

Since we probably would not be expected to do such difficult math (i.e., to add 100 fractions each with a different denominator), that is exactly why the answer choices are in the form of an inequality. Thus, we do not need to know the EXACT value of M. The easiest way to determine the RANGE of values for M is to use easy numbers that can be quickly manipulated.

Notice that 1/200 is greater than each of the addends and that 1/300 is less than or equal to each of the addends. Therefore, instead of trying to add together 1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + ...+ 1/300, we are going to add 1/200 one hundred times and 1/300 one hundred times. These two sums will give us a high estimate of M and a low estimate of M. Again, we are adding 1/200 one hundred times and 1/300 one hundred times because there are 100 numbers from 1/201 to 1/300.

Instead of actually adding each one of these values one hundred times, we will simply multiply each value by 100.

This gives us:

1/300 x 100 = 1/3

1/200 x 100 = 1/2

We see that M is between 1/3 and 1/2.

Answer: A

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:37 pm
bhoglund wrote:All the explanations provided so far have been very helpful! Another way to solve this problem is as follows:

- Numerator: There are 100 fractions in the set. All of them have a numerator of 1, so 1 x 100 = 100.
- Denominator: The average value of all the denominators in the set is 250.5. (201+300)/2 = 250.5.

Then simplify 100/250.5 to 1/2.505.

1/3 < 1/2.505 < 1/2

The answer is A.
This is a little dangerous. It does give you a ballpark, but denominators don't average in the same way that numerators would: (1/2 + 1/3)/2 ≠ 1/2.5, (1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4)/3 ≠ 1/3, etc. The average is "close" in some sense, but whether that close is close enough depends on the answers given.