BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

What is the value of x*?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by TRANGZON » Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:13 am
I choose B
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:29 pm
D

because from 1 we get x^2 = 0, therefore x has to be 0.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:49 pm
apoorva.srivastva wrote:For all integers n, n*=n (n-1). What is the value of x*?

(1.) X*=X
(2.) (X - 1 ) * = (X - 2)


OA after some discussion !! :)
Let's actually look at the algebra.

(1) x* = x

We also know that x* = x(x-1), so:

x(x-1) = x

x^2 - x = x

subtracting x from both sides:

x^2 - 2x = 0

x(x-2) = 0

x = 0 OR x = 2... insufficient.

(2) (x-1)* = (x-2)

We also know that (x-1)* = (x-1)(x-1-1) = (x-1)(x-2) = x^2 - 3x + 2, so:

x^2 - 3x + 2 = x - 2

subtracting x from both sides and adding 2 to both sides:

x^2 - 4x + 4 = 0

(x-2)(x-2) = 0

We have a perfect square, therefore x = 2... sufficient. Choose B.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by thebigkats » Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:31 pm
I reached answer D, please help in why it is wrong:

STAT #1

x*=x
==> x(x-1)=x
==> (dividing both sides by x) (x-1) = 1
==> x = 2
SUFFICIENT

STAT #2
(x - 1 )* = (x - 2)
==> (x-1) (x-2) = (x-2)
==> (dividing both sides by (x-2)) (x-1) = 1
==> x = 2
SUFFICIENT

So why is it B and not D?

thanks
Join the discussion

by Zerks87 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:05 am
thebigkats wrote:I reached answer D, please help in why it is wrong:

STAT #1

x*=x
==> x(x-1)=x
==> (dividing both sides by x) (x-1) = 1
==> x = 2
SUFFICIENT

STAT #2
(x - 1 )* = (x - 2)
==> (x-1) (x-2) = (x-2)
==> (dividing both sides by (x-2)) (x-1) = 1
==> x = 2
SUFFICIENT

So why is it B and not D?

thanks
For statement 1 you have to expand the brackets before you can do anything, thus x(x-1) = x expands to x^2 - x = x which simplified to x^2 - 2x = 0 therefore x = 0 and x = 2, N.S.


Hope that helps.
Join the discussion

by diaca » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:49 pm
So, always for an expression such as x*(x-1)=x, in which I have an x multiplying in both sides, Is it always wrong to cancel the x?
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:26 am
diaca wrote:So, always for an expression such as x*(x-1)=x, in which I have an x multiplying in both sides, Is it always wrong to cancel the x?

To divide by x, x should not be equal to 0.

so in this case you cannot divide by x in condition (i)
Join the discussion

by rid » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:54 am
(1) Insufficient
x=x(x-1) => x = 0 and/or x = 2

(2) Sufficient
(x-1)(x-2)=(x-2) => (x-2)(x-2)=0, x=2
Join the discussion

by madhan_dc » Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:08 am
As per one of the previous posts. I dont understand why we cannot divide each side by x in statement 1. Can anyone please explain this?

i divided both sides by x in statement 1 and got x =2

my answer was D.
Join the discussion

by diaca » Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:27 am
madhan_dc wrote:As per one of the previous posts. I dont understand why we cannot divide each side by x in statement 1. Can anyone please explain this?

i divided both sides by x in statement 1 and got x =2

my answer was D.
You cannot divide by X because we know nothing about X. We don't know if x equals zero. If the statement says that X doesn't equal zero, then you could divide by X.
Join the discussion

by rid » Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:30 am
madhan_dc wrote:As per one of the previous posts. I dont understand why we cannot divide each side by x in statement 1. Can anyone please explain this?

i divided both sides by x in statement 1 and got x =2

my answer was D.
Madhan: division by an unknown X may end up with a division by 0 (zero), which is undefined.
Join the discussion

by tetura84 » Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:52 am
diaca wrote:So, always for an expression such as x*(x-1)=x, in which I have an x multiplying in both sides, Is it always wrong to cancel the x?
It is not wrong, but you have to consider the sign of x, x can be positive or negative.
In your case, you are only considering positive.

x(x-1) = x
then,
x-1 = +/- 1
which equals x = 0,2
78 clicks can change my life !
Join the discussion

by sushantgupta » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:40 am
From satatement 1
x* = x(x-1) = x => x(x-2) = 0 hence x = 0 , 2
in sufficient

From statement 2
(x - 1 )* = (x - 2) => (x-1)(x-2) = (x-2) => (x-2)^2= 0
=> x = 2
sufficient.
Join the discussion

by prashant misra » Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:21 am
this was an easy one but i did some calculation mistake.finally i understood.i solved the first expression x*=x(x-1) and putting values as x=x(x-1) and second statement as (x-1)*=(x-1)(x-1-1)
Join the discussion