BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Second hand clothing---Accidental injury

Expert replies
by aditya.j » Mon May 14, 2012 10:41 pm
In America, children who are given secondhand clothing tend to come from households with more children. This makes sense, but what is unusual is that children who wear secondhand clothing also tend to be injured accidentally more often than children who do not wear secondhand clothing.

Which of the following statements best explains the conclusion drawn above?


(A) Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to have parents who are more concerned about their safety and well-being.

(B) Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get their sleeves and cuffs caught on playground equipment and have accidents.

(C) Younger children who come from larger families tend to get injured accidentally at high rates because they tend to engage in rough play with their older siblings.

(D) The youngest child, who gets the most secondhand clothing, is also the most likely to have an accidental injury.

(E) Secondhand clothing is nearly indistinguishable from clothing bought new.


c

[spoiler] Isnt D wrong cos it speaks only of the youngest child, whereas C speaks about children in general who might be wearing 2nd hand clothing? [/spoiler]

aJ
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mathbyvemuri » Tue May 15, 2012 1:17 am
The understanding is like this:
In families with more number of children, the younger children get cloths of their elder siblings and hence the children who are given second hand clothing tend to come from households with more children.

[spoiler](A)It is opposing the conclusion instead of explaining it.
(B)"The second hand clothing does not fit well", this premise can't be taken granted, as it is not mentioned.
(C)logical
(D)It does not explains the reason for the conclusion, but only supports it.
(E)It's irrelevant[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue May 15, 2012 7:21 am
D doesn't work because the stimulus does not say that more secondhand clothing correlates to more injuries; it simply says that secondhand clothing correlates to more injuries. In other words, the comparison is secondhand vs. not secondhand rather than different levels of secondhand.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by abhi.iitb » Wed May 16, 2012 3:16 am
Can anyone identify the conclusion in the above argument. I have marked B option.
Join the discussion

by mathbyvemuri » Thu May 17, 2012 4:21 am
abhi.iitb wrote:Can anyone identify the conclusion in the above argument. I have marked B option.
The conclusion is:
"children who wear secondhand clothing also tend to be injured accidentally more often than children who do not wear secondhand clothing".
And it is asked for the logic behind the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by jackswwagar » Sun May 27, 2012 10:50 pm
I find the second answer is the best one that it is because longer sleeves they feel uncomfortable.

injury lawyer Mississauga
Join the discussion