What GMAT tests and why?

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

What GMAT tests and why?

by pemdas » Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:24 pm
I don't stop thinking about the content of GMAT and syllabus proposed by the exam makers. So far, it has been suggested that GMAT tests only basic math schooled in grades 7-10, no calculus and trigonometry are included. The reading comprehension is part of many standardized tests such as TOEFL, SAT and critical reasoning is one section tested with many graduate admission exams in other countries, e.g. in India- CAT. The truth, however, is that creators of GMAT only make us to believe that nothing special is being tested in exam by omitting the complex subjects, like ones mentioned for math (calculus, trigonometry), and by naming its verbal passage questions as reading comprehension. The truth is that GMAT math is not high school level math. Otherwise why so many math college graduates would fall in love and constantly improve their GMAT sports by tutoring many examinees and posting their solutions on internet forums? Reading comprehension as well as critical reasoning on GMAT are the very special domains of human critical thinking ability. We must be closely familiar with deductive reasoning, and this is possible by our building/obtaining new knowledge based on the comprehended (in the past) concepts. Simultaneously, in exam, we have to approach GMAT RC and CR questions as critical readers, that is we need to repel our prior concepts and still think critically. This is fairly difficult as all our life we used to think critically by applying our prior knowledge and GMAT demands very special skill of critical reading, note please, not critical thinking - but reading. This sort of exam requires our application of brutal knowledge framed with some strategy too. This all makes me to believe again that GMAT is very difficult exam.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sat Mar 31, 2012 5:30 pm
As far as the math section goes, the vast majority of the concepts tested fall into "high school math." The biggest issue, I think, is that the methods you learned in high school aren't always the best/quickest/most efficient ways to solve those problems. Specifically, in coordinate geometry, there are a few things where I remember being taught the long way to do something. To find the x-intercept of a line, for instance, I was taught to set y equal to 0 and solve for x. Now I know that you can find the x-intercept by finding -b/m.

Overall, I think the knowledge required for the quant section of the GMAT is pretty much what you'd expect from "high school math," but the application of that knowledge and the way problems are set up (wording, layering of multiple concepts/areas of math, etc.) is much different.

Really, I can appreciate what the GMAT is trying to do: focus on the application of knowledge rather than the knowledge itself. In business school and the business world, you'll have access to the information you need. The question is do you have the reasoning skills required to make use of what's available to you?
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:28 pm
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:The question is do you have the reasoning skills required to make use of what's available to you?
This is very much interesting, as CEO-J.P.Morgan will make use of resources in the way different from that attested with and demanded by the Data Sufficiency/DS part of Quantitative section in GMAT. DS part will test bottom-up thinking viable mostly for entrepreneurial reasoning. The CEO named above will always be set some target (objective) and then should start thinking about making the use of resources to achieve one's target. So what GMAT will test with DS part may not be expected from CEO, as the latter will be applying top-down thinking and the different way of resource usage. Some people outside of the business school (not passing GMAT) will be exercising the way of reasoning tested in DS/Quant part of GMAT in their daily entrepreneurial work.

However, my question was about not what I highlight here and it isn't about y=mx+b with the evident, almost one-second ruminating of y=0 and subsequent x=-b/m. My question is how Beat-the-GMAT peers adapt their old-fashioned skills acquired in high school and college to stay cool in exam.
Success doesn't come overnight!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 10:15 pm
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:2 members

by AbhiJ » Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:43 pm
pemdas,

Put yourself in the shoes of the GMAC and think about creating an exam which will differentiate people from engineering PhDs, politicial science graduates to fashion/entertainment majors. What exam would you create so that it is unbiased towards all. Suggest a solution that is better than GMAT.