BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

TRICKY - Ed caught some fish, and the combined

Expert replies
by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Mar 28, 2017 6:54 am
Ed has some fish, and the combined weight of all the fish is 100 pounds. The weights of the fish are all different. Ed gives the 3 heaviest fish to Ann, the 2 lightest fish to Bob, and the remaining fish to Carol. If the combined weight of the 3 heaviest fish is 50 pounds, how many fish does Carol receive?

(1) The combined weight of the fish Carol receives is 30 pounds.
(2) The combined weight of the fish Bob receives is 20 pounds.

Answer: D

Source: www.gmatprepnow.com
Difficulty level: 750+
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Mo2men » Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:01 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Ed has some fish, and the combined weight of all the fish is 100 pounds. The weights of the fish are all different. Ed gives the 3 heaviest fish to Ann, the 2 lightest fish to Bob, and the remaining fish to Carol. If the combined weight of the 3 heaviest fish is 50 pounds, how many fish does Carol receive?

(1) The combined weight of the fish Carol receives is 30 pounds.
(2) The combined weight of the fish Bob receives is 20 pounds.

Answer: B

Source: www.gmatprepnow.com
Difficulty level: 750+
Hi Brent,

Really tricky question. But I could not understand why B. I thought it is D.

I look forward to your solution soon. :)
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:04 pm
Mo2men wrote:
Hi Brent,

Really tricky question. But I could not understand why B. I thought it is D.

I look forward to your solution soon. :)
Yes, I'm looking forward to my solution too!! :-)

. . . . okay, you win; the answer is, indeed, D (I've edited my original post to show D as the correct answer)

For some reason, while creating the question this weekend, I somehow convinced myself that knowing Carol received 30 pounds of fish wasn't enough to conclude that Bob received 20 pounds (even though the total weight is 100 pounds). Yeesh!

I played around with that question for a while before posting, and I quite like it. Perhaps the community members can help make it a true 750+ question. All we need is a tricky replacement for statement 1 that isn't a version/consequence of statement 2.

Any takers?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Wed Mar 29, 2017 7:08 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Yes, I'm looking forward to my solution too!! :-)

. . . . okay, you win; the answer is, indeed, D (I've edited my original post to show D as the correct answer)

For some reason, while creating the question this weekend, I somehow convinced myself that knowing Carol received 30 pounds of fish wasn't enough to conclude that Bob received 20 pounds (even though the total weight is 100 pounds). Yeesh!

I played around with that question for a while before posting, and I quite like it. Perhaps the community members can help make it a true 750+ question. All we need is a tricky replacement for statement 1 that isn't a version/consequence of statement 2.

Any takers?

Cheers,
Brent
I will start to charge you for changing OA. :):):)

When I read 750+, I feel that you need to do something in statement 1 to make insufficient.

I tried hard to make 1 insufficient. I used many different combinations with average fish weight with Ann and Bob but, due to restrictions in prompt itself, I failed to prove insufficiency.

What about removing that 'Bob has the 2 lightest fish', does it make a difference?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:05 am
Mo2men wrote: What about removing that 'Bob has the 2 lightest fish', does it make a difference?
Unfortunately, removing that info would make statement 1 insufficient.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion