Hit Hard By The Beast 760 In Preps To 620 in Real Thing

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:09 pm
Posting after two hours of introspection after taking the test.
Scored an abysmal 620 Q49 V 26 :(
Worst verbal score ever :( :(

Exam Day (July 2nd 2009):
Gave my exam in SanFrancisco since the San Jose location is under renovation and could not get a date when I was booking. So SFO is 30 mile ride for me. Exam time was 2:00 Pm today. To be stress free from traffic I stayed overnight in SFO next to the pearson office ( 0.5 mile walking distance).

Woke up early in the morning around 6:30AM, revised my math notes and verbal notes. Did few sample questions on math and verbal to get my brain in to the test mode. Walked to pearson's office at 10:30 AM to confirm my appointment details (yes I was paranoid). The lady told me that there was a computer free and I can take the exam right away. Since I was mentally prepared to take the exam at 2:00 I declined and went to the park, which was in front of the test center. Spent around 1.5 hours relaxing and came back around 12:00PM. Checked in for the test. Everything was going perfect until now.

I had the perfect level of anxiety, calm and composed. Drank some water and took the seat. Started AWA and finished the analysis of argument in 25 mins, reviewed 5 mins. Then went to analysis of issue, finished in 23 mins and reviewed and structured in next 7 mins. For the preparation, I spent few hours on the template approach, practiced writing couple of times when taking exams, so it was relatively very easy. The questions were straight forward.

Took the break. Ate a banana, drank some water and took the seat again. Quant started with a fairly easy question and got me in to the cruising mode. There was not a single instance where I felt I was taking the real exam until now. I was very composed and in perfect mode of mental alertness ( there were some very tricky questions that were thrown at me and I was happy to figure them), saw one repeat (not exact but values changed) from GPrep and was happy since that was a tricky one. Had 2 to 3 lenghthy questions (read brute force calculations like decimal division with large numbers) so took a guess and moved on so that I dont burn time on these lengthy calculations. Finally had 6 mins to spare on the last 2 questions. So took my own sweet time to do the 36th question and the 37 was a killer but did manage to finish on time. Was looking forward for a 49 to 50 in quant since that was my typical score on preps.

Took the break again. Ate another banana, drank some water and emptied fluid from my system from my previous refill. Was in great mood, no anxiety, and was TOTALLY under control before I started verbal. Again never felt for a second that I was dong the real thing and was in complete control. Verbal started. First one was a SC. KILLER. Spent around 1.5 mins and I took the best shot on it. Second was again a SC and it was equally tough. Then CR. My strenghts are CR and RC. My SC skills are very flaky some days I score full and some days I make terrible mistakes. Anyways, back to the test, RC being my strength I messed up the first RC question; I was already seeing that I am spending invariably around 2 mins around each question on Verbal which according to my practice history means I am headed in for trouble. Typically I finish verbal section with 15 to 20 mins to spare and my typical verbal score are in the range of high 30 (37+) to low 40s (44) average around 42. The SC questions until the first half of the exam were extremely diffcult for me, CR and RC were equally bad but I could figure out and solve them. But in most of the SCs I did not see what was wrong in the question. After the first half of verbal I was sensing that the questions I was getting for SCs were below my level and I was seeing the errors in the questions in my face. I got a bunch of SC questions in the first half and few CRs since I knew I cracked all the CRs correctly. Got fours RCs, nothing unexpected in total (2 big 2 small). One long RC was really hard with full of native american words and english translations. This was in the first half of the questions. So all in all SC and RC killed my level. The second half was a breeze and did not realize until question 33 that damage was already done. Suddenly it struck to me that I never saw a bold face question. And said to my self that I was still doing fine. SC level again increased in the last part. Got a series of CRs and I think I got them all right except for 1 where I had to guess. In the middle of verbal I felt that I was losing my control. I thought I held the bull by its horns but until the end did not realize that it stabbed me really bad.

I finished verbal with 3 mins to spare. Not usual at all, the only times I actually used up all the time was when I was scoring really high around 45 and 47, two instances. So I was foolishly confident that I was fine since I finished with 3 mins to spare. I was hoping for a score of 760 (which was my typical score on practise tests).

SAW 620 AND MY HEART SANK :( :(

GUESS JULY 2nd IS NOT MY DATE.

Preparation:
I studied, OG10, OG11, GPREP multiple times, PowerPrep, Manhattan GMAT SCs, CR Bible and 1000SCs.

I am a working professional and my prep has been on and off for the past 1 year. For the past 15 days I had a terrible schedule and personal life. My grandfather passed away two weeks back and I broke down completely, did not study for that whole week. After that I was caught up with work and until yesterday night 12 I was working. I was able to spend atleast 2 to 3 hours for 2 to 3 days in the week but the last two weeks I could not concentrate at all. I was still confident for a 760 since took a practise test last week and everything seemed fine.

Practise score (Gprep1 and Gprep2 with repeats):
Q - 47 - 12 quant mistakes with 4 questions unanswered 690
V - 37 - 9 verbal mistakes with 1 qtn unanswered

Q - 50 - 7 Quant mistakes with 6 repeats 740
V - 40 - 7 Verbal mistakes with 1 RC, 4 SC, 2 CR

Q - 49 - 10 Mistakes 760
V - 45 - 4 mistakes

Q - 50 - 7 mistakes 770
V - 42 - 7 mistakes

Q - 50 - 9 Mistakes 780
V - 47 - 2 mistakes

Q - 50 - 6 Mistakes 790
V - 47 - 2 mistakes

Q - 50 - 6 mistakes 760
V - 41 - 5 mistakes

Q - 49 - 9 mistakes 700
V - 36 - 10 mistakes 3 sc, 4 cr, 3 rc

Q - 51 - 1 mistake (4 repeat) 770
V - 44 - 4 mistakes

Q - 51 - 6 mistakes (770)
V - 44 - 5 mistakes

Q - 50 - 5 mistakes (750)
V - 41 - 7 mistakes

Q - 49 - 9 mistakes ( 760)
V - 44 - 4 mistakes

Q - 50 - 6 mistakes (760)
V - 44 - 5 mistakes

======

Going on vacation to India this week so break from GMAT and Work. Will come back with iron fists and cut the bulls horns..

July 2nd was really not my day :( :(
==================

One important thing to note is that, if you repeat GPrep multiple times the exam will just feel like the prep. Not a single question type on Quant for the real thing was something which I had not seen on GPrep. Verbal was also equally identical to GPrep but I am still not able to figure out why I screwed it up so bad.
Source: — I just Beat The GMAT! |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:57 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:720

by gmat_dest » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:54 am
seeing a bold face in verbal does not mean that you are in the high 30s in verbal.

I saw one in the 40th question and I ended up with V28 :-(

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:14 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:760

by rs2010 » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:05 am
why do we think bold face is indicator of high score?

When I scored 570 my second or third question was bold face and I ended up getting 20 in verbal, but this time I scored 760 and there was no bold face in entire verbal section.

I think we need to move over from this bold face thing. Again it might possible that bold face can be experimetal question or may be from 500-600 bin so getting that right will not going to help.

Take vacation, do not think GMAT there and come back with full force:)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:02 pm
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:720

by wgrau » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:11 am
Congrats on your math score, bummer on your verbal.

After reading your debrief it sounds like you did some practice tests with the AWA, but most were done without doing AWA. Would this be a fair assessment of your prep? If this is the case, I would say the biggest reason you saw a dramatic decrease in scores between your practice and actual test is a lack of mental endurance. If you read most advice from the GMAT prep pros, they all recommend practice tests with the AWA. The reason for this is not necessarily to practice AWA, but to build up the mental stamina to get through a four hour test. Without this realistic prep, your practice test scores can in fact be artificially high because you did not subject yourself to actual test conditions.

Do more practice tests with AWA, not for AWA practice, but to build your stamina to make it through verbal without crashing.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:50 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by ogbeni » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:39 am
"Going on vacation to India this week so break from GMAT and Work. Will come back with iron fists and cut the bulls horns"
^ That's the spirit my friend. You already have the right attitude. You'll definitely do better next time.

Verbal really requires concentration.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:09 pm

by gmat_verbal » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:52 am
gmat_dest, hemantsood: I was not betting on bold face question for high score but it some how made me realize that when I was seeing SC's of different caliber (easier) than the ones I saw at the beginning I thought for a second about CRs, since the difficulty level did not go down for CRs. Then for a moment realized that I did not see a bold face question; There were around three complete the blank questions though.

But after 12 hours of thinking, still I am finding it tough to see how the SCs were soo difficult and how I misjudged the verbal section :(

wgrau: I found from the forums that stamina kills performance so I was writing two exams atleast past month and was building mental stamina. I practised some relaxing tricks, so I never felt that I was losing control of the exam. Typically when I did practise I used to feel like quitting the exam in the last 1 hour (if doing full 4 hours) as I used to feel tired, so I worked on changing my attitude and built some postive reinforcement in to thinking.

Ogbeni: Thank you for your encouragement. I am not giving up until I kill this beast now (no horns). My determination increased after 1 day of introspection, hope I can keep up. I know I have to double my prep time and be very consistent in my SCs. You are correct, verbal needs concentration and I will work on that.

Thank you all for taking time to read my story and giving me feed back. Greatly appreciate your encouragement and advice !!!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:25 am
Received a PM asking me to respond. Nice job on the quant!

As another poster asked above, did you do the essays when taking practice tests? Did you take practice tests under full official conditions (only 10 min breaks between sections)? Did you take practice tests at the same general time of day as you took the real test?

It sounds like you also had some nerves going on during the verbal section. Here are links to a couple of articles on stress management; something in these might be useful for you:

https://www.manhattangmat.com/stress-tips.cfm
https://www.manhattangmat.com/strategy-series-stress.cfm

Re: your verbal prep, how much time did you spend analyzing the answer choices after you'd tried a problem?

On SC, f I were to show you a particular difference in answer choices but NOT show you the full problem (or even the full answer choices), would you be able to tell me which rule is probably being tested? You can probably do this for some things right now (eg, "has" and "have" would be a pretty straightforward split), but you can also probably get better at this. The splits, or differences in the choices, are the major clues that (should immediately) tell us what rules we need to think about / apply for that choice. That will help with both your speed and your accuracy.

Try this exercise: approach these as you would a math problem, to some extent, where you see certain "symbols" and that causes you to categorize the problem in a particular way. The "symbols" you'll see are the differences in the answer choices, and those "symbols" should be your immediate clue that a particular rule is being tested. Take a file or notebook and make two columns. On the left-hand side, write down the name of a particular grammar error (eg, subj-verb agreement). On the right-hand side, write down what the splits tend to look like for that type of error (eg, nouns that sometimes include "s" and sometimes don't; verbs that sometimes include "s" and sometimes don't).

For any type of verbal question, when studying a problem, did you try to articulate:
- why was the wrong answer so tempting? why did it look like it might be right? (be as explicit as possible)
- why was it actually wrong? what specific words indicate that it is wrong and how did I overlook those clues the first time?
- why did the right answer seem wrong? what made it so tempting to cross off the right answer? why were those things actually okay - what was my error in thinking that they were wrong?
- why was it actually right?
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me