Princeton Review CR

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:54 am

Princeton Review CR

by debohaldar » Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:07 am
Hey folks,

did anyone feel that some of the CR questions in PR Tests as well as the verbal workbook are not properly structured ? I'm having a 96% hit rate with OG CR, but in PR its around 78%. I feel that some of their reasoning doesn't make very much sense as you can find counter examples to nullify the argument.

Did anyone else feel the same way ?

cheers,
Deb
Deb
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:16 am
The issue is that we still do not find way to crack it.
in the OG, it form us the general rule for standard questions.
however, we need variable rules to treat varible questions.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org