Struggling Finding a Strategy That Works

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:04 pm

Struggling Finding a Strategy That Works

by bd2009 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:51 pm
I am having a hard time coming up with a study strategy that works well for me. I took the Kaplan course then tried (to no success yet 540, 570, 630,570, 650, 540...very inconsistent) to come up with a study strategy that will help me consistently score high(700+). I want to know if someone can share with me what worked for them.


Below I describe the problems I am having, and what I am currently doing. If you have time please read. Maybe you can help me out!! :D


OVERAMBITIOUS?:
I want to study each CAT and problem set that I do. I want to go through the problems and see why I got them wrong or why I got them right. This is very time consuming. I work full time and only have about 2 hours per weekday and 8 hours on the weekend. Any suggestions?

CAN'T FIND ENOUGH STRUCTURE IN THE AVAILABLE BOOKS:
I did very well in school and went to a top university with a top degree and a very good GPA. In order to get good grades in a math class I would study the heck out of a subject. I would make sure I knew how to do the problems, then move on. With the GMAT I find this hard to do. And...for me, this is why:

The GMAT is not set up like a class,... but that is what I need!!!!

I feel like I need a syllabus (with corresponding problems sets)!
And...not just a GENERAL syllabus (like every GMAT study book has - at least from what I found). I need a specific syllabus with problems sets to do on each subtopic.

Sample of what the GMAT books have*:
Algebra
Num Props
Proportions
Prop of sets
Geometry

*Very general and problem types are scattered about making it very difficult to exercise with the topics.


I need something like this**:
Algebra
-Lines
-Systems of equations
-Inequalities/Abs Value
Num Props
-Divisibility
-Factors, Multiples, etc.
-Odds/evens
Proportions:
-etc...etc...

**Very specific with problem types grouped together allowing one to get significant exercise with each topic.

With sets of problems in each section that would let me master the topics. You know..."exercises" like in school. Exercises that would help you master and get stronger at a topic. I can't find this anywhere!! So, I have spent a tremendous amount of time planning.


This is my current plan(revision 5...yes 5):

Study the four big quant sections:
ALG, NUM PROPS, PROPORTIONS, PROP OF SETS

1.) Review Kaplan lesson.
2.) Do Kaplan sets (online)
3.) Review Kaplan sets.
4.) Do related OG problems using Kaplans sheet that shows lists of probs by topic.
5.) Review OG probs.
6.) Form list of all probs I got wrong and keep all work in a binder.
7.) Review ones I got wrong after studying and try again.
8.) Keep list for "finals" week where I got back and try all of the hardest problems that I got wrong.
9.) Do a CAT and then review it.

Is this a good strategy? Can anyone give me a hand? Has anyone had my similar frustrations and found what worked for them?

Please share. Until then, I am going to get studying.

I had one more question:
Should I study verbal and quant at the same time? If so, how? I only have 2 hours during weekdays and 8 hours on the weekend (quitting my job to study is a great idea, but not an option).


Thanks for reading. I really appreciate it.
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:19 am
You are not overambitious. Actually, really understanding why you got a problem wrong is the way to go. You should strive for quality, not quantity. Having really little time at hand only highlights this.

If you feel the need for a class, maybe one would be worth it. You have some discounts available on our site for well-known prep companies. However, if you're just looking for a syllabus, then I know for a fact that Kaplan has one for their Kaplan Premier program.

I know Manhattan GMAT has a series of targeted books, 5 for quant and 3 for verbal. Their SC guide is particularly well-reviewed on this forum, so it might be worth your time to check out their other "offerings". I've also heard about the EZ series, but they're not as highly regarded as MGMAT.

I generally like you strategy because I see a lot of the verb "to review". That's what makes me feel confident that you'll succeed! Good luck!

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:04 pm

by bd2009 » Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:16 pm
DanaJ wrote:You are not overambitious. Actually, really understanding why you got a problem wrong is the way to go. You should strive for quality, not quantity. Having really little time at hand only highlights this.

If you feel the need for a class, maybe one would be worth it. You have some discounts available on our site for well-known prep companies. However, if you're just looking for a syllabus, then I know for a fact that Kaplan has one for their Kaplan Premier program.

I know Manhattan GMAT has a series of targeted books, 5 for quant and 3 for verbal. Their SC guide is particularly well-reviewed on this forum, so it might be worth your time to check out their other "offerings". I've also heard about the EZ series, but they're not as highly regarded as MGMAT.

I generally like you strategy because I see a lot of the verb "to review". That's what makes me feel confident that you'll succeed! Good luck!
Diana,
I looked in to the Manhattan materials and I definately want to give it a try. The books seem more focussed thatn what Kaplan offers. I want to look at them(inside first though).

I am definately going to purchase the SC book. I heard good things about it, and it's an are I need to work on.

What do you think about studying Verbal and Quant at the same time? I want to be sure to not neglect either, but I am not sure of a good way to combine the two.

Brian

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:57 am
I used to go for verbal all the time. For quant, I just answered questions on this forum. However, note that I started off with a score of 50 out of 51, so I knew I had little issues with this one.

I guess you could combine them according to which one is your greatest weakness. Say it's verbal: go for 70% verbal and 30% quant.